» Articles » PMID: 16348373

Chemotactic Responses of Marine Vibrio Sp. Strain S14 (CCUG 15956) to Low-Molecular-Weight Substances Under Starvation and Recovery Conditions

Overview
Date 1990 Dec 1
PMID 16348373
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The chemotactic responses by starved cells of marine Vibrio sp. strain S14 differed from those elicited by cells that were not nutrient limited. The rate of chemotaxis at different concentrations of several attractants varied for starved and growing cells. Vibrio sp. strain S14 showed positive chemotaxis to leucine, valine, arginine, and glucose at the onset of energy and nutrient deprivation. A continued, though decreased, positive response was demonstrated fro leucine, arginine, and glucose at 10 h of starvation. Cells starved for 3 h displayed a stronger response to glucose than those starved for shorter or longer times. However, cells starved for 5 and 10 h responded more strongly to a lower concentration of glucose than did cells starved for 0 and 3 h. Starvation for 24 h elicited no measurable chemotaxis to leucine, arginine, or glucose. The motility decreased by over 95% in the cell population after 24 h of starvation, which resulted in a low sensitivity in the chemotaxis assay. A switch in the response to valine was observed by 3 h of starvation. The addition of nutrients of 22-h-starved cells elicited a temporary positive chemotactic response to leucine by 2 and 4 h of nutrient recovery, while cells at 1 and 6 h of recovery showed no response. At 2 h of recovery, the greatest response was recorded to 10 M leucine, whereas at 4 h it was to 10 M leucine. Ten to fifty percent of the 22-h-starved cell population regained their motility after 4 h of nutrient-aided recovery. It is possible that two types of chemosensory systems exist in marine bacteria. Starved and growing cells responded to different concentrations of the attractant, and growing cells displayed a saturated chemotactic system with leucine as the attractant, unlike the response during starvation.

Citing Articles

Nocturnal Acidification: A Coordinating Cue in the - Symbiosis.

Pipes B, Nishiguchi M Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(7).

PMID: 35409100 PMC: 8999011. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073743.


The Effect of Visible Light on Cell Envelope Subproteome during Survival at 20 °C in Seawater.

Orruno M, Parada C, Kaberdin V, Arana I Microorganisms. 2021; 9(3).

PMID: 33805730 PMC: 8001661. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9030594.


Small-scale distribution of microbes and biogeochemistry in the Great Barrier Reef.

Carreira C, Carvalho J, Talbot S, Pereira I, Lonborg C PeerJ. 2020; 8:e10049.

PMID: 33150061 PMC: 7585385. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10049.


The influence of cell size on marine bacterial motility and energetics.

Mitchell J Microb Ecol. 2013; 22(1):227-38.

PMID: 24194338 DOI: 10.1007/BF02540225.


Diverse populations of lake water bacteria exhibit chemotaxis towards inorganic nutrients.

Dennis P, Seymour J, Kumbun K, Tyson G ISME J. 2013; 7(8):1661-4.

PMID: 23514780 PMC: 3721116. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.47.


References
1.
Komeda Y, Suzuki H, Ishidsu J, Iino T . The role of cAMP in flagellation of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Gen Genet. 1976; 142(4):289-98. DOI: 10.1007/BF00271253. View

2.
Chet I, Mitchell R . The relationship between chemical structure of attractants and chemotaxis by a marine bacterium. Can J Microbiol. 1976; 22(8):1206-8. DOI: 10.1139/m76-178. View

3.
Albertson N, Nystrom T, Kjelleberg S . Starvation-induced modulations in binding protein-dependent glucose transport by the marine Vibrio sp. S14. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990; 58(2):205-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb13979.x. View

4.
Mesibov R, Adler J . Chemotaxis toward amino acids in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1972; 112(1):315-26. PMC: 251414. DOI: 10.1128/jb.112.1.315-326.1972. View

5.
Adler J, Hazelbauer G, Dahl M . Chemotaxis toward sugars in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1973; 115(3):824-47. PMC: 246327. DOI: 10.1128/jb.115.3.824-847.1973. View