» Articles » PMID: 16346165

Substrates for Sulfate Reduction and Methane Production in Intertidal Sediments

Overview
Date 1983 Jan 1
PMID 16346165
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The activity of and potential substrates for methane-producing bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria were examined in marsh, estuary, and beach intertidal sediments. Slow rates of methane production were detected in all sediments, although rates of sulfate reduction were 100- to 1,000-fold higher. After sulfate was depleted in sediments, the rates of methane production sharply increased. The addition of methylamine stimulated methanogenesis in the presence of sulfate, and [C]methylamine was rapidly converted to CH(4) and CO(2) in freshly collected marsh sediment. Acetate, hydrogen, or methionine additions did not stimulate methanogenesis. [methyl-C]methionine and [2-C]acetate were converted to CO(2) and not to CH(4) in fresh sediment. No reduction of CO(2) to CH(4) occurred in fresh sediment. Molybdate, an inhibitor of sulfate reduction, inhibited [2-C]acetate metabolism by 98.5%. Fluoracetate, an inhibitor of acetate metabolism, inhibited sulfate reduction by 61%. These results suggest that acetate is a major electron donor for sulfate reduction in marine sediments. In the presence of high concentrations of sulfate, methane may be derived from novel substrates such as methylamine.

Citing Articles

Methyl-Based Methanogenesis: an Ecological and Genomic Review.

de Mesquita C, Wu D, Tringe S Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2023; 87(1):e0002422.

PMID: 36692297 PMC: 10029344. DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00024-22.


A Kinetic Model for Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production of Plant Biomass under High Salinity.

Wang J, Liu B, Sun M, Chen F, Terashima M, Yasui H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(11).

PMID: 35682524 PMC: 9180399. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116943.


Change in the microbial community of saline geothermal fluids amended with a scaling inhibitor: effects of heat extraction and nitrate dosage.

Westphal A, Eichinger F, Eichinger L, Wurdemann H Extremophiles. 2019; 23(3):283-304.

PMID: 30778766 DOI: 10.1007/s00792-019-01080-0.


Influences of Different Halophyte Vegetation on Soil Microbial Community at Temperate Salt Marsh.

Chaudhary D, Kim J, Kang H Microb Ecol. 2017; 75(3):729-738.

PMID: 28986657 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-017-1083-y.


Why do sulfate-reducing bacteria outcompete methanogenic bacteria for substrates?.

Kristjansson J, Schonheit P Oecologia. 2017; 60(2):264-266.

PMID: 28310495 DOI: 10.1007/BF00379530.


References
1.
Sorensen J, Christensen D, Jorgensen B . Volatile Fatty acids and hydrogen as substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic marine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981; 42(1):5-11. PMC: 243952. DOI: 10.1128/aem.42.1.5-11.1981. View

2.
Banat I, Lindstrom E, Nedwell D, Balba M . Evidence for coexistence of two distinct functional groups of sulfate-reducing bacteria in salt marsh sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981; 42(6):985-92. PMC: 244143. DOI: 10.1128/aem.42.6.985-992.1981. View

3.
Sansone F, Martens C . Methane production from acetate and associated methane fluxes from anoxic coastal sediments. Science. 1981; 211(4483):707-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.211.4483.707. View

4.
Mah R, Ward D, Baresi L, Glass T . Biogenesis of methane. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977; 31:309-41. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.001521. View

5.
Winfrey M, Zeikus J . Anaerobic metabolism of immediate methane precursors in Lake Mendota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979; 37(2):244-53. PMC: 243195. DOI: 10.1128/aem.37.2.244-253.1979. View