» Articles » PMID: 16345607

Comparison of in Situ and in Vitro Rates of Methane Release in Freshwater Sediments

Overview
Date 1980 Aug 1
PMID 16345607
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anaerobic lake sediment incubated in vitro was investigated for its ability to mimic natural in situ sediment activities, using rate of methane production for the comparison. Two lakes with different rates and seasonal patterns of methanogenic activity were compared. There was good agreement (at the 97.5% confidence level) between rates of in situ methane release and initial (lasting an average of 120 h) rates of production measured in vitro in surface (0- to 3-cm) sediment. Evidence from this study, and others, indicated that it is the in situ surface sediment methane production which is primarily responsible for maintaining in situ methane release, and thus the above agreement was what was expected if surface in situ activity was maintained in vitro. When deeper sediment was investigated, however, the sum of in vitro rates from 0 to 20 cm (measured in 1.5- to 3-cm intervals) was much higher than in situ release rates and would have resulted in an impossibly high volume of gas. The extra gas could not have been stored within the sediments. We conclude that the in situ methanogenic activity of the 0- to 3-cm anaerobic surface sediments could be preserved during removal and laboratory incubation. However, similar treatment of deeper sediment appeared to stimulate methanogenic activity.

Citing Articles

Depth distribution of microbial production and oxidation of methane in northern boreal peatlands.

Sundh I, Nilsson M, Granberg G, Svensson B Microb Ecol. 2013; 27(3):253-65.

PMID: 24190339 DOI: 10.1007/BF00182409.


Spatial variability in biodegradation rates as evidenced by methane production from an aquifer.

Adrian N, Robinson J, Suflita J Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994; 60(10):3632-9.

PMID: 16349410 PMC: 201866. DOI: 10.1128/aem.60.10.3632-3639.1994.


Methane production in Minnesota peatlands.

Williams R, Crawford R Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984; 47(6):1266-71.

PMID: 16346565 PMC: 240215. DOI: 10.1128/aem.47.6.1266-1271.1984.


Sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in the sediment of a saltmarsh on the East coast of the United kingdom.

Senior E, Lindstrom E, Banat I, Nedwell D Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982; 43(5):987-96.

PMID: 16346022 PMC: 244174. DOI: 10.1128/aem.43.5.987-996.1982.


Measurement of mercury methylation in lake water and sediment samples.

Furutani A, Rudd J Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980; 40(4):770-6.

PMID: 16345649 PMC: 291658. DOI: 10.1128/aem.40.4.770-776.1980.


References
1.
Winfrey M, Zeikus J . Anaerobic metabolism of immediate methane precursors in Lake Mendota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979; 37(2):244-53. PMC: 243195. DOI: 10.1128/aem.37.2.244-253.1979. View

2.
Zeikus J, Winfrey M . Temperature limitation of methanogenesis in aquatic sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976; 31(1):99-107. PMC: 169725. DOI: 10.1128/aem.31.1.99-107.1976. View

3.
Powell M, DOEBBLER G, HAMILTON Jr R . Serum enzyme level changes in pigs following decompression trauma. Aerosp Med. 1974; 45(5):519-24. View

4.
Strayer R, Tiedje J . Kinetic parameters of the conversion of methane precursors to methane in a hypereutrophic lake sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978; 36(2):330-40. PMC: 291222. DOI: 10.1128/aem.36.2.330-340.1978. View

5.
Martens C . Control of methane sediment-water bubble transport by macroinfaunal irrigation in cape lookout bight, north Carolina. Science. 1976; 192(4243):998-1000. DOI: 10.1126/science.192.4243.998. View