» Articles » PMID: 16338251

Impact of Combined Secondary Prevention Therapy After Myocardial Infarction: Data from a Nationwide French Registry

Overview
Journal Am Heart J
Date 2005 Dec 13
PMID 16338251
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several classes of medications improve survival in patients with coronary artery disease. Whether these medications, as used in the real world, have additive efficacy remains speculative.

Objectives: To assess whether patients discharged on combined secondary prevention medications after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have improved 1-year survival, compared with the action of any single class of medications.

Design And Setting: Nationwide registry of consecutive patients admitted to intensive care units for AMI in November 2000 in France. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, including a propensity score for the prescription of combined therapy, was used.

Results: Of the 2119 patients discharged alive, 1095 (52%) were prescribed a combination of antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, and statins (triple therapy), of whom 567 (27%) also received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (quadruple therapy) and 528 (25%) did not. One-year survival was 97% in patients receiving triple combination therapy versus 88% in those who received either none, 1, or 2 of these medications (P < .0001). After multivariate adjustment including the propensity score, the hazard ratio for 1-year mortality in patients with triple combination therapy was 0.52 (95% CI 0.33-0.81). In patients with ejection fraction < or = 35%, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were independent predictors of survival, and combination therapy had no additional prognostic value.

Conclusions: Compared with the prescription of any single class of secondary prevention medications, combination therapy offers additional protection in patients with AMI.

Citing Articles

The Prevalence and Impact of Evidence-Based Medications on Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Post-Revascularization in Oman.

Al-Hadithy D, Al-Maqbali J, Al-Riyami A, Al Zaabi M, Al-Zakwani I Pharmacy (Basel). 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 37218961 PMC: 10204429. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy11030079.


Effect of evidence-based therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ma T, Wong I, Man K, Chen Y, Crake T, Ozkor M PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210988.

PMID: 30657781 PMC: 6338367. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210988.


Evaluation of medication compliance for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome.

Gill D, Feldman E, Liu K Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2017; 30(4):410-412.

PMID: 28966446 PMC: 5595376. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11930208.


Optimal medical therapy for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome: 18-month follow-up results at a tertiary teaching hospital in South Korea.

Byeon H, Yang Y, Choi E Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016; 12:167-75.

PMID: 26929629 PMC: 4758787. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S99869.


Optimal combination secondary prevention drug treatment and stroke outcomes.

Park J, Ovbiagele B Neurology. 2014; 84(1):50-6.

PMID: 25411440 PMC: 4336098. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001099.