» Articles » PMID: 16336676

Response Inhibition Deficits in Externalizing Child Psychiatric Disorders: an ERP-study with the Stop-task

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2005 Dec 13
PMID 16336676
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evidence from behavioural studies suggests that impaired motor response inhibition may be common to several externalizing child psychiatric disorders, although it has been proposed to be the core-deficit in AD/HD. Since similar overt behaviour may be accompanied by different covert brain activity, the aim of this study was to investigate both brain-electric-activity and performance measures in three groups of children with externalizing child psychiatric disorders and a group of normal controls.

Methods: A Stop-task was used to measure specific aspects of response inhibition in 10 children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD), 8 children with oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder (ODD/CD), 11 children with comorbid AD/HD+ODD/CD and 11 normal controls. All children were between 8 and 14 years old. Event-related potentials and behavioural responses were recorded. An initial go-signal related microstate, a subsequent Stop-signal related N200, and performance measures were analyzed using ANCOVA with age as covariate.

Results: Groups did not differ in accuracy or reaction time to the Go-stimuli. However, all clinical groups displayed reduced map strength in a microstate related to initial processing of the Go-stimulus compared to normal controls, whereas topography did not differ. Concerning motor response inhibition, the AD/HD-only and the ODD/CD-only groups displayed slower Stop-signal reaction times (SSRT) and Stop-failure reaction time compared to normal controls. In children with comorbid AD/HD+ODD/CD, Stop-failure reaction-time was longer than in controls, but their SSRT was not slowed. Moreover, SSRT in AD/HD+ODD/CD was faster than in AD/HD-only or ODD/CD-only. The AD/HD-only and ODD/CD-only groups displayed reduced Stop-N200 mean amplitude over right-frontal electrodes. This effect reached only a trend for comorbid AD/HD+ODD/CD.

Conclusion: Following similar attenuations in initial processing of the Go-signal in all clinical groups compared to controls, distinct Stop-signal related deficits became evident in the clinical groups. Both children with AD/HD and ODD/CD showed deficits in behavioural response-inhibition accompanied by decreased central conflict signalling or inhibition processes. Neither behavioural nor neural markers of inhibitory deficits as found in AD/HD-only and ODD/CD-only were additive. Instead, children with comorbid AD/HD+ODD/CD showed similar or even less prominent inhibition deficits than the other clinical groups. Hence, the AD/HD+ODD/CD-group may represent a separate clinical entity.

Citing Articles

The interaction of ADHD traits and trait anxiety on inhibitory control.

Hare C, Panda E, Collins T, Segalowitz S, Tekok-Kilic A Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(2):e14734.

PMID: 39627957 PMC: 11871067. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14734.


The Effects of Exergaming on Attention in Children With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ji H, Wu S, Won J, Weng S, Lee S, Seo S JMIR Serious Games. 2023; 11:e40438.

PMID: 37159253 PMC: 10206614. DOI: 10.2196/40438.


Neural Correlates of Executive Functioning in Anorexia Nervosa and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Thomas K, Birch R, Jones C, Vanderwert R Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:841633.

PMID: 35693540 PMC: 9179647. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.841633.


Identification and Validation of Distinct Latent Neurodevelopmental Profiles in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study.

Lichenstein S, Roos C, Kohler R, Kiluk B, Carroll K, Worhunsky P Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021; 7(4):352-361.

PMID: 33706021 PMC: 8426420. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.02.013.


"My Brain Can Stop": An ERP Study of Longitudinal Prediction of Inhibitory Control in Adolescence.

Einziger T, Ben-Shachar M, Devor T, Shmueli M, Auerbach J, Berger A Brain Sci. 2021; 11(1).

PMID: 33451149 PMC: 7828591. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010100.


References
1.
Pliszka S, Liotti M, Woldorff M . Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism. Biol Psychiatry. 2000; 48(3):238-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00890-8. View

2.
Kopp B, Mattler U, GOERTZ R, Rist F . N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996; 99(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1016/0921-884x(96)95617-9. View

3.
Overtoom C, Kenemans J, Verbaten M, Kemner C, van der Molen M, van Engeland H . Inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a psychophysiological study of the stop task. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 51(8):668-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01290-2. View

4.
Kopp B, Rist F, Mattler U . N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology. 1996; 33(3):282-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb00425.x. View

5.
Jodo E, Kayama Y . Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 82(6):477-82. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-l. View