» Articles » PMID: 16320168

Relationships Between Energetic, Stroke Determinants, and Velocity in Butterfly

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2005 Dec 2
PMID 16320168
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between the bioenergetical and the biomechanical variables (stroke parameters), through a range of swimming velocities, in butterfly stroke. Three male and one female butterflier of international level were submitted to an incremental set of 200-m butterfly swims. The starting velocity was 1.18 m . s (-1) for the males and 1.03 m . s (-1) for the female swimmer. Thereafter, the velocity was increased by 0.05 m . s (-1) after each swim until exhaustion. Cardio-pulmonary and gas exchange parameters were measured breath by breath for each swim to analyze oxygen consumption and other energetic parameters by portable metabolic cart (K4b (2), Cosmed, Rome, Italy). A respiratory snorkel and valve system with low hydrodynamic resistance was used to measure pulmonary ventilation and to collect breathing air samples. Blood samples from the ear lobe were collected before and after each swim to analyze blood lactate concentration (YSI 1500 L, Yellow Springs, US). Total energy expenditure (E (tot)), energetic cost (EC), stroke frequency (SF), stroke length (SL), mean swimming velocity (V), and stroke index (SI) were calculated for each lap and average for each 200-m stage. Correlation coefficients between E (tot) and V, EC, and SF, as well as between EC and SI were statistically significant. For the relation between EC and SL, only one regression equation presented a correlation coefficient with statistical significance. Relations between SF and V, as well as between SI and V were significant in all of the swimmers. Only two individual regression equations presented statistically significant correlation coefficient values for the relation established between V and the SL. As a conclusion, the present sample of swims demonstrated large inter individual variations concerning the relationships between bioenergetic and biomechanical variables in butterfly stroke. Practitioners should be encouraged to analyze the relationships between V, SF, and SL individually to detect the deflection point in SL in function of swimming velocity to further determine appropriate training intensities when trying to improve EC.

Citing Articles

Where are the fastest master butterfly swimmers competing in the FINA World Masters Championships from?.

Weiss K, Seffrin A, Andrade M, Ahmad W, Forte P, Moreitz S EXCLI J. 2023; 22:604-619.

PMID: 37636025 PMC: 10450210. DOI: 10.17179/excli2023-6199.


Which of the Physiological vs. Critical Speed Is a Determinant of Modern Pentathlon 200 m Front Crawl Swimming Performance: The Influence of Protocol and Ergometer vs. Swimming Pool Conditions.

Demarie S, Chirico E, Billat V Sports (Basel). 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36548498 PMC: 9787823. DOI: 10.3390/sports10120201.


Comparison of performance of various leg-kicking techniques in fin swimming in terms of achieving the different goals of underwater activities.

Rejman M, Siemontowski P, Siemienski A PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0236504.

PMID: 32745109 PMC: 7398542. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236504.


Modelling the 200 m Front-Crawl Performance Predictors at the Winter Season Peak.

Costa M, Santos C, Marinho D, Silva A, Barbosa T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(6).

PMID: 32210037 PMC: 7142514. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062126.


Physiological, biomechanical and anthropometrical predictors of sprint swimming performance in adolescent swimmers.

Latt E, Jurimae J, Maestu J, Purge P, Ramson R, Haljaste K J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 9(3):398-404.

PMID: 24149633 PMC: 3761703.