Outcome of Non-invasive Treatment Modalities on Back Pain: an Evidence-based Review

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2005 Dec 2

PMID 16320031

Citations 83

Authors

Maurits W Van Tulder

Bart Koes

Antti Malmivaara

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

At present, there is an increasing international trend towards evidence-based health care. The field of low back pain (LBP) research in primary care is an excellent example of evidence-based health care because there is a huge body of evidence from randomized trials. These trials have been summarized in a large number of systematic reviews. This paper summarizes the best available evidence from systematic reviews conducted within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group on non-invasive treatments for non-specific LBP. Data were gathered from the latest Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. The Cochrane reviews were updated with additional trials, if available. Traditional NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, and advice to stay active are effective for short-term pain relief in acute LBP. Advice to stay active is also effective for long-term improvement of function in acute LBP. In chronic LBP, various interventions are effective for short-term pain relief, i.e. antidepressants, COX2 inhibitors, back schools, progressive relaxation, cognitive-respondent treatment, exercise therapy, and intensive multidisciplinary treatment. Several treatments are also effective for short-term improvement of function in chronic LBP, namely COX2 inhibitors, back schools, progressive relaxation, exercise therapy, and multidisciplinary treatment. There is no evidence that any of these interventions provides long-term effects on pain and function. Also, many trials showed methodological weaknesses, effects are compared to placebo, no treatment or waiting list controls, and effect sizes are small. Future trials should meet current quality standards and have adequate sample size.

Citing Articles

Does rehabilitation improve work participation in patients with chronic spinal pain after spinal surgery: a systematic review.

Callens J, Lavreysen O, Goudman L, De Smedt A, Putman K, Van de Velde D J Rehabil Med. 2025; 57:jrm25156.

PMID: 39749418 PMC: 11681149. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v57.25156.

Quality of lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and its relationship to pain duration, pain intensity, and quality of life.

Liu S, Reitmaier S, Modl L, Yang D, Zhang T, Becker L Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39644421 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11236-y.

Effectiveness of coordinated care to reduce the risk of prolonged disability among patients suffering from subacute or recurrent acute low back pain in primary care: protocol of the CO.LOMB cluster-randomized, controlled study.

Ramond-Roquin A, Begue C, Vizzini J, Chhor S, Bouchez T, Parot-Schinkel E Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1156482.

PMID: 37409270 PMC: 10318135. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1156482.

Effects of a movement control and tactile acuity training in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain and control impairment - a randomised controlled pilot study.

van Baal K, Allofs J, Ehrenbrusthoff K, Gruneberg C, Hering T, Kopkow C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21(1):794.

PMID: 33256694 PMC: 7702711. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03727-y.

Assessment of Lumbar Lordosis Distribution with a Novel Mathematical Approach and Its Adaptation for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Sandor Z, Rathonyi G, Dinya E Comput Math Methods Med. 2020; 2020:7312125.

PMID: 32377225 PMC: 7180428. DOI: 10.1155/2020/7312125.

References

Lacey P, Dodd G, Shannon D . A double blind, placebo controlled study of piroxicam in the management of acute musculoskeletal disorders. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1984; 7(3):95-104. View

Assendelft W, Morton S, Yu E, Suttorp M, Shekelle P . Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138(11):871-81. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00008. View

Waddell G . 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(7):632-44. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198709000-00002. View

Tesio L, Merlo A . Autotraction versus passive traction: an open controlled study in lumbar disc herniation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74(8):871-6. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90015-3. View

Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T, Heinrichs M, Koskenniemi L, Kuosma E . The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332(6):351-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199502093320602. View

Lonn J, Glomsrod B, Soukup M, Bo K, Larsen S . Active back school: prophylactic management for low back pain. A randomized, controlled, 1-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(9):865-71. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199905010-00006. View

Bendix A, Bendix T, Haestrup C, BUSCH E . A prospective, randomized 5-year follow-up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J. 1998; 7(2):111-9. PMC: 3611221. DOI: 10.1007/s005860050040. View

Worz R, Bolten W, Heller B, Krainick J, Pergande G . [Flupirtine in comparison with chlormezanone in chronic musculoskeletal back pain. Results of a multicenter randomized double-blind study]. Fortschr Med. 1996; 114(35-36):500-4. View

Mitchell R, Carmen G . The functional restoration approach to the treatment of chronic pain in patients with soft tissue and back injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(6):633-42. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199403001-00001. View

10.

Stankovic R, Johnell O . Conservative treatment of acute low back pain. A 5-year follow-up study of two methods of treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(4):469-72. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199502001-00010. View

11.

Staal J, Hlobil H, Twisk J, Smid T, Koke A, van Mechelen W . Graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140(2):77-84. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-2-200401200-00007. View

12.

LIDSTROM A, Zachrisson M . Physical therapy on low back pain and sciatica. An attempt at evaluation. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970; 2(1):37-42. View

13.

Jenkins D, Ebbutt A, Evans C . Tofranil in the treatment of low back pain. J Int Med Res. 1976; 4(2 Suppl):28-40. View

14.

Hadler N, Curtis P, Gillings D, Stinnett S . A benefit of spinal manipulation as adjunctive therapy for acute low-back pain: a stratified controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(7):702-6. View

15.

Spence S, Schotte D . Cognitive-behavioural therapy versus EMG biofeedback in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(6):691-7. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00008-l. View

16.

Evans D, Burke M, LLOYD K, Roberts E, Roberts G . Lumbar spinal manipulation on trial. Part I--clinical assessment. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1978; 17(1):46-53. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/17.1.46. View

17.

Oliphant D . Safety of spinal manipulation in the treatment of lumbar disk herniations: a systematic review and risk assessment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004; 27(3):197-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.12.023. View

18.

Wilkinson M . Does 48 hours' bed rest influence the outcome of acute low back pain?. Br J Gen Pract. 1995; 45(398):481-4. PMC: 1239372. View

19.

Pratzel H, Alken R, Ramm S . Efficacy and tolerance of repeated oral doses of tolperisone hydrochloride in the treatment of painful reflex muscle spasm: results of a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Pain. 1996; 67(2-3):417-25. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03187-9. View

20.

Szpalski M, Hayez J . How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? Objective assessment of trunk function. Eur Spine J. 2010; 1(1):29-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF00302139. View