» Articles » PMID: 16311284

Physicians' Perceptions and Attitudes Regarding Inappropriate Admissions and Resource Allocation in the Intensive Care Setting

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2005 Nov 29
PMID 16311284
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Physicians' perceptions regarding intensive care unit (ICU) resource allocation and the problem of inappropriate admissions are unknown.

Methods: We carried out an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire survey to assess the perceptions and attitudes of ICU physicians at all 20 ICUs in Milan, Italy, regarding inappropriate admissions and resource allocation.

Results: Eighty-seven percent (225/259) of physicians responded. Inappropriate admissions were acknowledged by 86% of respondents. The reasons given were clinical doubt (33%); limited decision time (32%); assessment error (25%); pressure from superiors (13%), referring clinician (11%) or family (5%); threat of legal action (5%); and an economically advantageous 'Diagnosis Related Group' (1%). Respondents reported being pressurized to make more 'productive' use of ICU beds by Unit heads (frequently 16%), hospital management (frequently 10%) and colleagues (frequently 4%). Five percent reported refusing appropriate admissions following 'indications' not to admit financially disadvantageous cases. Admissions after elective surgery prioritized patients from profitable surgical departments: frequently for 6% of respondents and occasionally for 15%. Sixty-seven percent said they frequently received requests for appropriate admissions when no beds were available. This was considered sufficient reason to withdraw treatment from patients with lower survival probability (sometimes 21%) or for whom nothing more could be done (sometimes 51%, frequently 11%).

Conclusions: Inappropriate ICU admissions were perceived as a common event but were mainly attributed to difficulties in assessing suitability. Physicians were aware that their decisions were often influenced by factors other than medical necessity. Economic influences were perceived as limited but not negligible. Decisions to forgo treatment could be influenced by the need to admit other patients.

Citing Articles

Echocardiograms and bed placement in patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.

Lodhi H, Singer E, McGlynn M, Wang J, Hoefgen E, Srinivasan M Transl Pediatr. 2024; 13(8):1406-1414.

PMID: 39263296 PMC: 11384424. DOI: 10.21037/tp-24-161.


The Tumor Risk Score (TRS) - next level risk prediction in head and neck tumor surgery.

Klausing A, Waschk K, Far F, Martini M, Kramer F Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024; 28(4):1547-1556.

PMID: 39030324 PMC: 11480139. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-024-01281-8.


Decision-making in the ICU: An analysis of the ICU admission decision-making process using a '20 Questions' approach.

Gopalan P, Pershad S, Pillay B South Afr J Crit Care. 2023; 36(1).

PMID: 37283820 PMC: 10241076. DOI: 10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i1.398.


A retrospective cohort study of short-stay admissions to the medical intensive care unit: Defining patient characteristics and critical care resource utilization.

Pandit P, Mallozzi M, Mohammed R, McDonough G, Treacy T, Zahustecher N Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022; 12(3):127-132.

PMID: 36506929 PMC: 9728074. DOI: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_6_22.


When is it considered reasonable to start a risky and uncomfortable treatment in critically ill patients? A random sample online questionnaire study.

Zink M, Horvath A, Stadlbauer V BMC Med Ethics. 2021; 22(1):146.

PMID: 34732195 PMC: 8564596. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00705-4.