» Articles » PMID: 16310793

Control of Ground Reaction Forces by Hindlimb Muscles During Cat Locomotion

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2005 Nov 29
PMID 16310793
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been proposed that biarticular muscles are primarily responsible for the control of the direction of external forces, as their activation is closely related and highly sensitive to the direction of external forces. This functional role for biarticular muscles has been supported qualitatively by experimental evidence, but has never been tested quantitatively for lack of a mathematical/mechanical formulation of this theory and the difficulty of measuring individual muscle forces during voluntary movements. The purposes of this study were: (1) to define rules for muscular coordination based on the control of external forces; (2) to develop a model of the cat hindlimb that allows for the calculation of the magnitude and direction of the ground reaction forces (GRFs) produced by individual hindlimb muscles; and (3) to test if the coordination of mono- and biarticular cat hindlimb muscles is related to the control of the resultant GRF. We measured the GRF, hindlimb kinematics, selected muscle forces and activations during cat locomotion. Then, the measured muscle forces were used as input to the hindlimb model to compute the muscle-induced GRF. We assume that if activation (and possibly force) increased as the muscle-induced component of GRF approximated the resultant GRF, then that muscle was used by the central nervous system (CNS) to help control the direction of the external GRF. During cat walking, medial gastrocnemius (MG) and plantaris (PL) forces increased with increasing proximity to the GRF, while soleus (SOL) forces and vastus lateralis (VL) activations did not. SOL and VL activation were most strongly related to the vertical and parallel (braking/accelerating) component of the GRF, respectively. We concluded from these results that MG and PL are primarily responsible for the control of the direction of the GRF, while SOL primarily functions as an anti-gravity muscle, and VL as an acceleration/deceleration muscle.

Citing Articles

Lower extremity joints and their contributions to whole limb extension.

Fox J, Jagodinsky A, Wilburn C, Smallwood L, Weimar W Int Biomech. 2021; 7(1):1-8.

PMID: 33998385 PMC: 8130711. DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2019.1695540.


Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walking.

Antoniak G, Biswas T, Cortes N, Sikdar S, Chun C, Bhandawat V Biol Open. 2019; 8(6).

PMID: 31097445 PMC: 6602329. DOI: 10.1242/bio.043695.


Characterization and validation of a split belt treadmill for measuring hindlimb ground-reaction forces in able-bodied and spinalized felines.

Dimiskovski M, Scheinfield R, Higgin D, Krupka A, Lemay M J Neurosci Methods. 2017; 278:65-75.

PMID: 28069392 PMC: 5323434. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.01.002.


The mechanical actions of muscles predict the direction of muscle activation during postural perturbations in the cat hindlimb.

Honeycutt C, Nichols T J Neurophysiol. 2013; 111(5):900-7.

PMID: 24304861 PMC: 3949226. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00706.2013.


Control of dynamic foot-ground interactions in male and female soccer athletes: females exhibit reduced dexterity and higher limb stiffness during landing.

Lyle M, Valero-Cuevas F, Gregor R, Powers C J Biomech. 2013; 47(2):512-7.

PMID: 24275440 PMC: 3947591. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.038.