» Articles » PMID: 1630763

The Pupillary Light Reflex. 2. Prevalence of Pupillary Autonomic Neuropathy in Diabetics Using Age-dependent and Age-independent Pupillary Parameters

Overview
Journal Ophthalmologica
Publisher Karger
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 1992 Jan 1
PMID 1630763
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Seventy-seven diabetics with a duration of the disease ranging from 2 to 55 years (average 18.5 years) were studied with infrared videopupillometry. The prevalence of diabetic autonomic neuropathy at the pupillary control system (pANP) was studied comparatively using several pupillary tests. The average prevalence using age-dependent parameters was 30.2% [maximal pupillary area: 22.1%, maximal contraction velocity: 24.7%, contraction velocity at 1 s (CV1): 28.6%, and dilation velocity at 6 s (DV6): 45.5%]. Comparing these percentages to prevalences of other diabetic late complications, e.g. retinopathy (49.4%), DV6 seems to be good for the diagnosis of pANP. If CV1 and DV6 are expressed in percent of the maximal pupillary area (CV1% and DV6%), they become age-independent. The average CV1% and DV6% of diabetics differ highly significantly from those of normals (CV1%: 58.6 +/- 14.5 vs. 64.1 +/- 6.4%, 2 p less than 0.005, and DV6%: 6.0 +/- 2.9 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.1%, 2 p less than 0.001). The average prevalence of pANP using these age-independent parameters was 25.4%. These data suggest that the prevalence of pANP, especially disorders of pupillary dilation (DV6), is high in long-standing diabetes. Furthermore, CV1% and DV6% have proved to be valid parameters in finding differences in the light reflex in non-age-matched study groups.

Citing Articles

Visual Function Measurements in Eyes With Diabetic Retinopathy: An Expert Opinion on Available Measures.

Glassman A, Elmasry M, Baskin D, Brigell M, Chong V, Davis Q Ophthalmol Sci. 2024; 4(5):100519.

PMID: 38881606 PMC: 11179417. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100519.


Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers.

Bicer G, Zor K, Kucuk E Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022; 70(10):3575-3578.

PMID: 36190049 PMC: 9789821. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22.


Role of a mydriasis-free, full-field flicker ERG device in the detection of diabetic retinopathy.

Degirmenci M, Demirel S, Batioglu F, Ozmert E Doc Ophthalmol. 2018; 137(3):131-141.

PMID: 30334119 DOI: 10.1007/s10633-018-9656-8.


A novel device for accurate and efficient testing for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy.

Maa A, Feuer W, Davis C, Pillow E, Brown T, Caywood R J Diabetes Complications. 2016; 30(3):524-32.

PMID: 26803474 PMC: 4853922. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.12.005.


Pupillary responses to single and sinusoidal light stimuli in diabetic patients.

Zangemeister W, Gronow T, Grzyska U Neurol Int. 2011; 1(1):e19.

PMID: 21577356 PMC: 3093222. DOI: 10.4081/ni.2009.e19.