» Articles » PMID: 16307255

The Control of Vertical Saccades in Aged Subjects

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2005 Nov 25
PMID 16307255
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In real life we produce vertical saccades at different distances and eccentricities, and while our fixation is more or less actively engaged. The goal of this study is to examine vertical saccades in aged and young subjects, taking into consideration all these parameters. Eleven adults (20-28 years) and 11 aged subjects (63-83 years) were recruited. We used LED targets at 7.5 degrees or 15 degrees, up or down in four conditions: gap and overlap tasks, each done at two distances-at near (40 cm) and at far (150 cm). In the gap task fixation target extinguishes prior to target onset, while in the overlap condition it stays on after target onset; consequently, visual attention and fixation are employed differently in the two tasks. Eye movements were recorded with the Chronos video eye tracker. Results showed that vertical saccades were longer for aged subjects than for young adults under almost all conditions. For both aged and young subjects, latencies were shorter under the gap than under the overlap task. Latencies for eccentric targets at 15 degrees were significantly longer than those at 7.5 degrees but for aged subjects only; this effect was more pronounced for upward saccades under the overlap condition. Express type of latencies (80-120 ms) occurred frequently in the gap task and at similar rates for young adults (16%) and aged subjects (12%); in the overlap task express latencies were scarce in young adults (0.4%) and aged subjects (1.8%). Age deteriorates the ability to trigger regular volitional saccades but not the ability to produce express type of saccades. Latency increase with aging is attributed to the degeneration of central areas, e.g. oculomotor cortical areas involved in the initiation of vertical saccades.

Citing Articles

Exploring age-related changes in saccades during cognitive tasks in healthy adults.

Yang H, Choe J, Noh S, Kim J, Han J, Kim K Front Behav Neurosci. 2024; 17:1301318.

PMID: 38249127 PMC: 10796470. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1301318.


The effects of age and sex on the incidence of multiple step saccades and corrective saccades.

Ma W, Zhang M Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:963557.

PMID: 36158551 PMC: 9490418. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.963557.


Saccadic eye movement performance reduces visual manipulation influence and center of pressure displacements in older fallers.

de Souza N, Brito M, Rodrigues S, Cavalieri B, Lima D, de Moraes R Exp Brain Res. 2021; 240(2):395-406.

PMID: 34741190 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06256-9.


Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field.

Feng J, Craik F, Levine B, Moreno S, Naglie G, Choi H Eur J Ageing. 2017; 14(2):167-177.

PMID: 28804400 PMC: 5550660. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-016-0399-7.


Long latency and high variability in accuracy-speed of prosaccades in Alzheimer's disease at mild to moderate stage.

Yang Q, Wang T, Su N, Liu Y, Xiao S, Kapoula Z Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2011; 1(1):318-29.

PMID: 22203824 PMC: 3246280. DOI: 10.1159/000333080.


References
1.
Goldring J, Fischer B . Reaction times of vertical prosaccades and antisaccades in gap and overlap tasks. Exp Brain Res. 1997; 113(1):88-103. DOI: 10.1007/BF02454145. View

2.
SCHILLER P, Sandell J, Maunsell J . The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1987; 57(4):1033-49. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1987.57.4.1033. View

3.
Findlay J . Express saccades: is there a separate population in humans?. Exp Brain Res. 1991; 87(1):218-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00228523. View

4.
Head D, Buckner R, Shimony J, Williams L, Akbudak E, Conturo T . Differential vulnerability of anterior white matter in nondemented aging with minimal acceleration in dementia of the Alzheimer type: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Cereb Cortex. 2004; 14(4):410-23. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh003. View

5.
Klein C, Brugner G, Foerster F, Muller W, Schweickhardt A . The gap effect in pro-saccades and anti-saccades in psychometric schizotypes. Biol Psychol. 2000; 55(1):25-39. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00062-4. View