» Articles » PMID: 16295263

Protecting Subjects Who Cannot Give Consent: Toward a Better Standard for "minimal" Risks

Overview
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2005 Nov 22
PMID 16295263
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When children and incapacitated adults are enrolled in research that cannot directly benefit them, they can be exposed to no more than "minimal" risks, according to guidelines accepted around the world. We need a new standard for what "minimal" risks are, however--one that recognizes that participating in non-beneficial research is like participating in a charitable activity. Such a standard appears likely to provide more stringent protections for these vulnerable populations.

Citing Articles

On Power and Freedom: Extending the Definition of Coercion.

Goltz S Perspect Behav Sci. 2020; 43(1):137-156.

PMID: 32440648 PMC: 7198671. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-019-00240-z.


Minimal or reasonable? Considering the ethical threshold for research risks to nonconsenting bystanders and implications for nonconsenting participants.

Lynch H Bioethics. 2020; 34(9):923-932.

PMID: 32091138 PMC: 8262376. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12725.


Therapeutic Misperceptions in Early-Phase Cancer Trials: From Categorical to Continuous.

Sisk B, Kodish E IRB. 2018; 40(4):13-20.

PMID: 30387976 PMC: 10347681.


A Defense of The-Risks-of-Daily-Life.

Binik A Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2017; 27(3):413-442.

PMID: 28989167 PMC: 5691379. DOI: 10.1353/ken.2017.0033.


Minimal Risk in Pediatric Research: A Philosophical Review and Reconsideration.

Rossi J, Nelson R Account Res. 2017; 24(7):407-432.

PMID: 28777661 PMC: 5618101. DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1363650.