» Articles » PMID: 16288664

The International Classification of Functioning As an Explanatory Model of Health After Distal Radius Fracture: a Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2005 Nov 18
PMID 16288664
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Distal radius fractures are common injuries that have an increasing impact on health across the lifespan. The purpose of this study was to identify health impacts in body structure/function, activity, and participation at baseline and follow-up, to determine whether they support the ICF model of health.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 790 individuals who were assessed at 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year post injury. The Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), The Wrist Outcome Measure (WOM), and the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form (SF-36) were used to measure impairment, activity, participation, and health. Multiple regression was used to develop explanatory models of health outcome.

Results: Regression analysis showed that the PRWE explained between 13% (one week) and 33% (three months) of the SF-36 Physical Component Summary Scores with pain, activities and participation subscales showing dominant effects at different stages of recovery. PRWE scores were less related to Mental Component Summary Scores, 10% (three months) and 8% (one year). Wrist impairment scores were less powerful predictors of health status than the PRWE.

Conclusion: The ICF is an informative model for examining distal radius fracture. Difficulty in the domains of activity and participation were able to explain a significant portion of physical health. Post-fracture rehabilitation and outcome assessments should extend beyond physical impairment to insure comprehensive treatment to individuals with distal radius fracture.

Citing Articles

Treatment of wrist stiffness through posture orthosis and active exercise: A case report.

Boccolari P, Lando M, Zingarello L, Vecchi L, Tedeschi R, Donati D Trauma Case Rep. 2024; 53:101068.

PMID: 38975269 PMC: 11226954. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101068.


Factors influencing functioning after volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a scoping review of 148 studies.

Boel S, Vinther A, Hansen A, Juhl C, Landgren M, Jacobsen N Acta Orthop. 2023; 94:280-286.

PMID: 37293983 PMC: 10253938. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2023.13431.


Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review.

Norton B, Bugden B, Liu K Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2022; 35(2):115-124.

PMID: 36467517 PMC: 9716466. DOI: 10.1177/15691861221114264.


Outcome Metrics in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged Above 50 Years: A Systematic Review.

Fogel N, Mertz K, Shapiro L, Roe A, Denduluri S, Kamal R Hand (N Y). 2021; 17(1_suppl):43S-49S.

PMID: 34286628 PMC: 9793608. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211028919.


Manual passive rehabilitation program for geriatric distal radius fractures.

Zhang W, Wang L, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Liang B, Zhang B Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(3):e24074.

PMID: 33546010 PMC: 7837967. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024074.


References
1.
Morris N . Distal radius fracture in adults: self-reported physical functioning, role functioning, and meaning of injury. Orthop Nurs. 2001; 19(4):37-48. View

2.
Pap G, Angst F, Herren D, Schwyzer H, Simmen B . Evaluation of wrist and hand handicap and postoperative outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. Hand Clin. 2003; 19(3):471-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0712(03)00004-0. View

3.
MacDermid J, Turgeon T, Richards R, Beadle M, Roth J . Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12(8):577-86. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199811000-00009. View

4.
Thompson P, Taylor J, Dawson A . The annual incidence and seasonal variation of fractures of the distal radius in men and women over 25 years in Dorset, UK. Injury. 2004; 35(5):462-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00117-7. View

5.
Melton 3rd L, Amadio P, Crowson C, OFallon W . Long-term trends in the incidence of distal forearm fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1999; 8(4):341-8. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050073. View