» Articles » PMID: 16281142

The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): Prospective Analysis of Complications and Risk Factors in 4000 Colonic Snare Polypectomies

Overview
Journal Endoscopy
Date 2005 Nov 11
PMID 16281142
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Study Aims: Screening colonoscopy with polypectomy has been shown to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal cancer. However, there is a lack of large and systematic prospective studies of the complications of polypectomy.

Patients And Methods: Data on all snare polypectomies performed in 13 institutions (six hospitals and seven gastroenterology offices) were recorded prospectively during a 20-month period, including data on a 30-day follow-up period. The primary end points of the study were polypectomy complications, which were classed as "major" or "minor". Risk factors for complications were analyzed for both patient characteristics and polyp parameters.

Results: A total of 3976 snare polypectomies in 2257 patients (mean age 64.5 years) were included in the study. The mean polyp size was 1.1 cm, and 72% were sessile. Complications occurred in 9.7% of patients (6.1% of polyps); 75% of these complications were minor; and the mortality rate was zero. Multivariate regression analysis revealed polyp size as the main risk factor, both for complications overall (odds ratio 6.56, 95%CI 4.45-9.67) and for major complications (odds ratio 31.01, 95%CI 7.53-128.1). Right-sided polyp location was a significant risk factor for major complications (odds ratio 2.40, 95%CI 1.34-4.28). Setting a cut-off value of 3% as an acceptable rate for major complications, polyps larger than 1 cm in the right colon or 2 cm in the left colon, and multiple polyps carried an increased risk.

Conclusions: Colonoscopic polypectomy is associated with a 10% rate of complications, but three-quarters of these are of minor clinical significance. More than 90% of the complications can be managed conservatively if adequate endoscopic expertise is available. Guidelines for intensified follow-up after polypectomy should be based on the size, location, and number of a patient's polyps.

Citing Articles

Clinical outcomes and risk factors of post-polypectomy microperforation in patients with colorectal neoplasia: a case-control study.

Shin S, Cho M, Nam J, Kim J, Yoon Y, Park H Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2025; 18():26317745241312521.

PMID: 39802936 PMC: 11719433. DOI: 10.1177/26317745241312521.


Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal pedunculated polyps.

Jakobs J, Zumblick M, von Gerlach S, Stathopoulos P, Glas S, Denkert C Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(12):E1437-E1446.

PMID: 39650095 PMC: 11624022. DOI: 10.1055/a-2427-1948.


The Bleeding Edge: Managing Coagulation and Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cirrhosis Undergoing Interventional Procedures.

Craciun R, Grapa C, Mocan T, Tefas C, Nenu I, Buliarca A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39594268 PMC: 11593119. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222602.


Optimal withdrawal time in initial surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal cancer surgery: comparison between anterior/low anterior resection and right hemicolectomy.

Bong J, Kim J, Ju Y, Cheong C, Kang S, Lee S Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024; 107(4):212-220.

PMID: 39416886 PMC: 11473322. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.4.212.


Risk factors for unclear margin in cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyp.

Ikeda R, Kaneko H, Sato H, Anan H, Suzuki Y, Ikeda A Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024; 36(12):1404-1409.

PMID: 39324929 PMC: 11527374. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002845.