Phenomenological Evidence for Two Types of Paranoia
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: Two types of paranoia have been identified, namely persecution (or 'Poor Me') paranoia, and punishment (or 'Bad Me') paranoia. This research tests predicted differences in phenomenology--specifically, in person evaluative beliefs, self-esteem, depression, anxiety, and anger.
Method: Fifty-three people with current paranoid beliefs were classified as Poor Me, Bad Me, or neither (classification was reliable). Key dependent variables were measured.
Results: All predictions were supported, except the one relating to anger, where the two groups did not differ. The Bad Me group had lower self-esteem, more negative self-evaluative thinking, lower negative evaluations about others, higher depression and anxiety. Importantly, the differences in self-esteem and self-evaluations were not fully accounted for by differences in depression.
Conclusion: Data support the presence of two distinct topographies of paranoia. Future research is needed to explore the theory further and examine clinical implications.
Paranoia and Data-Gathering Biases in Autism.
Bennert K, Brosnan M, Canning A, Roberts G, Russell A J Autism Dev Disord. 2024; .
PMID: 38421502 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06301-w.
Paranoid thinking and perceived competitive intention.
Horita Y PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15003.
PMID: 36923500 PMC: 10010176. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15003.
The profile of unusual beliefs associated with metacognitive thinking and attributional styles.
Coleman E, Croft R, Barkus E Psych J. 2022; 11(3):296-309.
PMID: 35168296 PMC: 9305741. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.528.
Transition Between Sensitive Delusion of Reference and Mood Disorder: A Case Report.
Esposito C, Fiorentini A, Callari A, Galeazzi G, Brambilla P Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:712552.
PMID: 34552517 PMC: 8450362. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.712552.
Monsonet M, Ballespi S, Sheinbaum T, Valiente C, Espinosa R, Kwapil T Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:623755.
PMID: 33790815 PMC: 8005540. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.623755.