» Articles » PMID: 16269539

Cooperative Water Filling of a Nonpolar Protein Cavity Observed by High-pressure Crystallography and Simulation

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2005 Nov 5
PMID 16269539
Citations 74
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Formation of a water-expelling nonpolar core is the paradigm of protein folding and stability. Although experiment largely confirms this picture, water buried in "hydrophobic" cavities is required for the function of some proteins. Hydration of the protein core has also been suggested as the mechanism of pressure-induced unfolding. We therefore are led to ask whether even the most nonpolar protein core is truly hydrophobic (i.e., water-repelling). To answer this question we probed the hydration of an approximately 160-A(3), highly hydrophobic cavity created by mutation in T4 lysozyme by using high-pressure crystallography and molecular dynamics simulation. We show that application of modest pressure causes approximately four water molecules to enter the cavity while the protein itself remains essentially unchanged. The highly cooperative filling is primarily due to a small change in bulk water activity, which implies that changing solvent conditions or, equivalently, cavity polarity can dramatically affect interior hydration of proteins and thereby influence both protein activity and folding.

Citing Articles

High hydrostatic pressure promotes gene transcription via a cystathionine-β-synthase domain-containing protein in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus yayanosii.

Li C, Li S, Song Q, Da L, Xu J Nucleic Acids Res. 2025; 53(1.

PMID: 39777464 PMC: 11705074. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1289.


A pressure-jump EPR system to monitor millisecond conformational exchange rates of spin-labeled proteins.

Grosskopf J, Sidabras J, Altenbach C, Anderson J, Mett R, Strangeway R Protein Sci. 2024; 33(12):e5220.

PMID: 39565088 PMC: 11577460. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5220.


A pressure-jump EPR system to monitor millisecond conformational exchange rates of spin-labeled proteins.

Grosskopf J, Sidabras J, Altenbach C, Anderson J, Mett R, Strangeway R bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38766191 PMC: 11100676. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.07.593074.


Pushed to extremes: distinct effects of high temperature versus pressure on the structure of STEP.

Guerrero L, Ebrahim A, Riley B, Kim M, Huang Q, Finke A Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):59.

PMID: 38216663 PMC: 10786866. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05609-0.


Changes in the hydrophobic network of the FliG domain induce rotational switching of the flagellar motor.

Nishikino T, Hijikata A, Kojima S, Shirai T, Kainosho M, Homma M iScience. 2023; 26(8):107320.

PMID: 37520711 PMC: 10372836. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107320.


References
1.
Dill K . Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990; 29(31):7133-55. DOI: 10.1021/bi00483a001. View

2.
Kundrot C, Richards F . Crystal structure of hen egg-white lysozyme at a hydrostatic pressure of 1000 atmospheres. J Mol Biol. 1987; 193(1):157-70. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90634-6. View

3.
Kleywegt G, Jones T . xdlMAPMAN and xdlDATAMAN - programs for reformatting, analysis and manipulation of biomacromolecular electron-density maps and reflection data sets. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1996; 52(Pt 4):826-8. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444995014983. View

4.
Ernst J, Clubb R, Zhou H, Gronenborn A, Clore G . Demonstration of positionally disordered water within a protein hydrophobic cavity by NMR. Science. 1995; 267(5205):1813-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.7892604. View

5.
Hummer G, Garde S, Garcia A, Paulaitis M, Pratt L . The pressure dependence of hydrophobic interactions is consistent with the observed pressure denaturation of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(4):1552-5. PMC: 19087. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1552. View