Esophagogastrectomy: the Influence of Stapled Versus Hand-sewn Anastomosis on Outcome

Overview

Journal J Gastrointest Surg

Specialty Gastroenterology

Date 2005 Nov 5

PMID 16269373

Citations 22

Authors

Abdollah Behzadi

Francis C Nichols

Stephen D Cassivi

Claude Deschamps

Mark S Allen

Peter C Pairolero

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Successful anastomosis is essential for favorable esophagogastrectomy outcomes. Before July 2002, almost all esophagogastric anastomoses at our institution were hand-sewn. We then began using linear stapled anastomotic techniques. This review compares patient outcomes with both techniques. From July 2001 to June 2004, 280 consecutive esophagogastrectomy patients (235 men and 45 women) were reviewed (median age, 65 years). The anastomosis was intrathoracic in 206 patients (74%) and cervical in 74 (26%). Anastomoses were hand-sewn in 205 patients (73%) and linear stapled in 75 (27%). Stapled anastomoses were intrathoracic in 33 patients (16%) and cervical in 42 (57%). Anastomotic leaks occurred in 30 patients (11%); 26 (12.7%) in the hand-sewn and 4 (5.3%) in the linear stapled group (P = .008). Leaks were asymptomatic in 17 patients (57%). Dilatation was required in 70 hand-sewn anastomoses (34%) and in 11 stapled (14.6%) (P = .001). Hand-sewn anastomoses were more likely to leak and require dilatation; odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were 5.35 (1.67-19.27) and 3.58 (1.66-8.34), respectively. A linear stapled anastomosis is safe and associated with both a significantly lower leak rate and the need for dilatation compared with hand-sewn anastomosis. This nonrandomized series suggests that linear stapled anastomosis is the preferred technique regardless of anastomotic location.

Citing Articles

A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi-mechanical with hand-sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE-study).

Nederlof N, Tilanus H, de Vringer T, van Lanschot J, Willemsen S, Hop W J Surg Oncol. 2020; 122(8):1616-1623.

PMID: 32989770 PMC: 7821322. DOI: 10.1002/jso.26209.

Modified Collard versus end-to-side hand-sewn anastomosis for cervical anastomosis after McKeown esophagectomy.

Li X, Xu Y, Cong Z, Luo J, Zhou H, Ji S Thorac Cancer. 2020; 11(10):2909-2915.

PMID: 32833352 PMC: 7529547. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13630.

Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.

Rasihashemi S, Ramouz A, Beheshtirouy S, Amini H BMC Gastroenterol. 2020; 20(1):250.

PMID: 32736599 PMC: 7393709. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01393-x.

Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Kamarajah S, Bundred J, Singh P, Pasquali S, Griffiths E BJS Open. 2020; 4(4):563-576.

PMID: 32445431 PMC: 7397345. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50298.

Comparison of the modified Collard and hand-sewn anastomosis for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Sugimura K, Miyata H, Matsunaga T, Asukai K, Yanagimoto Y, Takahashi Y Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019; 3(1):104-113.

PMID: 30697615 PMC: 6345657. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12220.

References

Law S, Fok M, Chu K, Wong J . Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997; 226(2):169-73. PMC: 1190951. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00008. View

Iannettoni M, Whyte R, Orringer M . Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 110(5):1493-500; discussion 1500-1. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70072-2. View

Briel J, Tamhankar A, Hagen J, DeMeester S, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E . Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 198(4):536-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.026. View

Ercan S, Rice T, Murthy S, Rybicki L, Blackstone E . Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 129(3):623-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024. View

Urschel J, Blewett C, Bennett W, Miller J, Young J . Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus. 2002; 14(3-4):212-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00187.x. View

Young M, Deschamps C, Trastek V, Allen M, Miller D, Schleck C . Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 70(5):1651-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01916-0. View

Vigneswaran W, Trastek V, Pairolero P, Deschamps C, Daly R, Allen M . Transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 56(4):838-44; discussion 844-6. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90341-e. View

Headrick J, Nichols 3rd F, Miller D, Allen M, Trastek V, Deschamps C . High-grade esophageal dysplasia: long-term survival and quality of life after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73(6):1697-702; discussion 1702-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03496-3. View

Orringer M, Marshall B, Iannettoni M . Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg. 1999; 230(3):392-400; discussion 400-3. PMC: 1420884. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00012. View

10.

Vigneswaran W, Trastek V, Pairolero P, Deschamps C, Daly R, Allen M . Extended esophagectomy in the management of carcinoma of the upper thoracic esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994; 107(3):901-6; discussion 906-7. View

11.

Fok M, Cheng S, Wong J . Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1991; 78(3):342-5. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800780323. View

12.

Orringer M, Marshall B, Iannettoni M . Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 119(2):277-88. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70183-8. View

13.

McKeown K . The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus. A review of the results in 478 cases. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1985; 30(1):1-14. View

14.

Orringer M . Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: what difference does it make?. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987; 44(2):116-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62018-8. View

15.

Cassivi S . Leaks, strictures, and necrosis: a review of anastomotic complications following esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 16(2):124-32. DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2004.03.011. View

16.

Valverde A, Hay J, Fingerhut A, Elhadad A . Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1996; 120(3):476-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80066-3. View

17.

Muller J, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H . Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1990; 77(8):845-57. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800770804. View

18.

Allen M . Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992; 4(4):320-3. View

19.

Collard J, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, Otte J, Kestens P . Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 65(3):814-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01384-2. View

20.

McLarty A, Deschamps C, Trastek V, Allen M, Pairolero P, Harmsen W . Esophageal resection for cancer of the esophagus: long-term function and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 63(6):1568-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00125-2. View