» Articles » PMID: 16254964

Predictive Value of Drug Levels, HIV Genotyping, and the Genotypic Inhibitory Quotient (GIQ) on Response to Saquinavir/ritonavir in Antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected Patients

Overview
Journal J Med Virol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2005 Oct 29
PMID 16254964
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plasma levels of HIV protease inhibitors (PI) are often close to IC50 values of wild-type viruses when administered without ritonavir boosting. The impact of drug levels, resistance mutations, and the genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) were examined on the response to saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r)-based salvage therapy. Patients with prior exposure to PI other than SQV and currently failing virologically were recruited prospectively in a multicenter trial. All patients began SQV/r 1000/100 mg bid plus another two antiretrovirals. A total of 139 patients was enrolled. At month 12, virological response (VR), defined as plasma HIV-RNA decline >1 log, was recorded in 68.2% of patients on treatment (41.7% in the intent-to-treat analysis). The median baseline number of protease resistance mutations was three. The VR was significantly lower in patients with >5 protease resistance mutations and in those with plasma SQV Cmin<0.1 microg/ml. At week 48, the VR was seen in 77.1% of patients with a GIQ>0.04 compared to 18.2% of those with a lower GIQ (P=0.001). In the multivariate analysis, <or=5 protease resistance mutations and SQV Cmin>0.1 microg/ml were independently associated with VR. Interestingly, drug levels had their highest predictive value of the VR at week 12, since low SQV plasma levels often permitted ruling out poorly adherent patients. In contrast, the number of protease resistance mutations had the highest impact on the VR at week 24, suggesting that for those taking the drugs, the VR is highly dependent of the presence of resistance mutations. At any time, nevertheless, the GIQ provided the most accurate prediction of the VR.

Citing Articles

Relationship between antiretroviral plasma concentration and emergence of HIV-1 resistance mutations at treatment failure.

Fabbiani M, Bracciale L, Ragazzoni E, Santangelo R, Cattani P, Di Giambenedetto S Infection. 2011; 39(6):563-9.

PMID: 21866336 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-011-0183-8.


Two different patterns of mutations are involved in the genotypic resistance score for atazanavir boosted versus unboosted by ritonavir in multiple failing patients.

Santoro M, Bertoli A, Lorenzini P, Ceccherini-Silberstein F, Gianotti N, Mussini C Infection. 2009; 37(3):233-43.

PMID: 19169632 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-008-8065-4.


Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir regimens in HIV-infected individuals.

Dickinson L, Boffito M, Back D, Khoo S, Pozniak A, Mugyenyi P J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008; 62(6):1344-55.

PMID: 18824460 PMC: 3597129. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn399.


Pharmacokinetic analysis to assess forgiveness of boosted saquinavir regimens for missed or late dosing.

Dickinson L, Boffito M, Khoo S, Schutz M, Aarons L, Pozniak A J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008; 62(1):161-7.

PMID: 18467305 PMC: 3672987. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn187.


Genotypic susceptibility scores and HIV type 1 RNA responses in treatment-experienced subjects with HIV type 1 infection.

Anderson J, Jiang H, Ding X, Petch L, Journigan T, Fiscus S AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008; 24(5):685-94.

PMID: 18462083 PMC: 2928289. DOI: 10.1089/aid.2007.0127.