» Articles » PMID: 16253149

Effects of Expiratory Rib-cage Compression on Oxygenation, Ventilation, and Airway-secretion Removal in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

Overview
Journal Respir Care
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2005 Oct 29
PMID 16253149
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Expiratory rib-cage compression, a chest physiotherapy technique, is well known as the "squeezing" technique in Japan.

Objective: To determine the effects of rib-cage compression on airway-secretion removal, oxygenation, and ventilation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Setting: An intensive care unit of an emergency and critical care center at a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Tokyo, Japan.

Methods: Thirty-one intubated, mechanically ventilated patients in an intensive care unit were studied in a randomized, crossover trial. The patients received endotracheal suctioning with or without rib-cage compression, with a minimum 3-hour interval between the 2 interventions. Rib-cage compression was performed for 5 min before endotracheal suctioning. Arterial blood gas and respiratory mechanics were measured 5 min before endotracheal suctioning (baseline) and 25 min after suctioning. The 2 measurement periods were carried out on the same day.

Results: There were no significant differences in the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen, P(aCO2), or dynamic compliance of the respiratory system between the 2 periods (before and after endotracheal suctioning). Moreover, there were no significant differences in airway-secretion removal between the 2 periods.

Conclusions: This study suggests that rib-cage compression prior to endotracheal suctioning does not improve airway-secretion removal, oxygenation, or ventilation after endotracheal suctioning in this unselected population of mechanically ventilated patients.

Citing Articles

Pulmonary expansion manoeuvres compared to usual care on ventilatory mechanics, oxygenation, length of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay, extubation, atelectasis, and mortality of patients in mechanical ventilation: A randomized clinical trial.

da Silva K, Oliveira C, Cabral L, Malaguti C, Jose A PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295775.

PMID: 38079432 PMC: 10712844. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295775.


A deep look into the rib cage compression technique in mechanically ventilated patients: a narrative review.

Jalil Y, Damiani L, Basoalto R, Bachmman M, Bruhn A Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022; 34(1):176-184.

PMID: 35766667 PMC: 9345587. DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220012-pt.


Efficacy of Respiratory Physiotherapy Interventions for Intubated and Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Van der Lee L, Hill A, Jacques A, Patman S Physiother Can. 2022; 73(1):6-18.

PMID: 35106019 PMC: 8774958. DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0025.


Effects of postural differences on intrapleural pressure during chest wall compression in healthy males.

Yamamoto K, Mase K, Kihara K, Ishikawa A, Ozaki K J Phys Ther Sci. 2021; 33(2):132-136.

PMID: 33642687 PMC: 7897531. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.33.132.


Comparison of bronchial hygiene techniques in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Naue W, Herve B, Vieira F, Deponti G, Martins L, Dias A Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019; 31(1):39-46.

PMID: 30892477 PMC: 6443316. DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190005.