» Articles » PMID: 16248332

Depth Cues Do Not Underlie Attentional Modulations of the Stroop Effect

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2005 Oct 27
PMID 16248332
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The well-known Stroop effect is usually attributed to the automaticity of word reading. Recently, Wühr and Waszak (2003) had participants name the color of one of two rectangles and found that words in the relevant object produced larger Stroop effects than did words in the irrelevant object or in the background. They attributed this difference to an object-based mechanism of attentional selection that amplifies processing of all the features of an attended object. However, in the displays used by Wühr and Waszak, occlusion suggested the presence of different depth planes. Hence, the increased Stroop effect could have resulted from perceiving the words to be in the same depth plane as the relevant object and not from perceiving the words to be parts of the relevant object. Two experiments tested between these accounts by using displays without monocular depth cues. The results of both experiments replicate those of Wühr and Waszak, supporting their object-based account.

Citing Articles

Inhibition is picky: shape difference is a necessary condition for attentional inhibition of irrelevant objects.

Wuhr P, Frings C Psychon Bull Rev. 2009; 16(5):839-44.

PMID: 19815786 DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.839.

References
1.
Duncan J . Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984; 113(4):501-17. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.113.4.501. View

2.
Brown T, Gore C, Carr T . Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002; 131(2):220-40. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.2.220. View

3.
Manwell L, Roberts M, Besner D . Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004; 11(3):458-62. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196595. View

4.
Posner M . Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980; 32(1):3-25. DOI: 10.1080/00335558008248231. View

5.
Melara R, Algom D . Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychol Rev. 2003; 110(3):422-71. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.422. View