» Articles » PMID: 16244547

Donation After Cardiac Death: the University of Wisconsin Experience with Liver Transplantation

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the outcomes of liver transplantation (LTx) from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are equivalent to those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors.

Summary Background Data: Because of the significant donor organ shortage, more transplant centers are using livers recovered from DCD donors. However, long-term, single-center outcomes of liver transplantation from DCD donors are limited.

Methods: From January 1, 1993, to July 31, 2002, 553 liver transplants were performed from DBD donors and 36 were performed from DCD donors. Differences in event rates between the groups were compared with Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test. Differences in proportion and differences of means between the groups were compared with Fisher exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively.

Results: Mean warm ischemic time at recovery in the DCD group was 17.8 +/- 10.6 minutes. The overall rate of biliary strictures was greater in the DCD group at 1 year (33% versus 10%) and 3 years (37% versus 12%; P = 0.0001). The incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein stenosis/thrombosis, ischemic-type biliary stricture (ITBS), and primary nonfunction were similar between groups. However, the incidence of both hepatic artery stenosis (16.6% versus 5.4%; P = 0.001) and hepatic abscess and biloma formation (16.7% versus 8.3%; P = 0.04) were greater in the DCD group. Trends toward worse patient and graft survival and increased incidence of ITBS were seen in DCD donors greater than 40 years compared with DCD donors less than 40 years. Overall patient survival at 1 year (DCD, 80%; versus DBD, 91%) and 3 years (DCD, 68%; versus DBD, 84%) was significantly less in the DCD group (P = 0.002). Similarly, graft survival at 1 year (DCD, 67%; versus DBD, 86%) and 3 years (DCD, 56%; versus DBD, 80%) were significantly less in the DCD group (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions: Despite similar rates of primary nonfunction, LTx after controlled DCD resulted in worse patient and graft survival compared with LTx after DBD and increased incidence of biliary complications and hepatic artery stenosis. However, overall results of LTx after controlled DCD are encouraging; and with careful donor and recipient selection, LTx after DCD may successfully increase the donor liver pool.

Citing Articles

Impact of Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest in the Brain-dead Donors on the Outcome of Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective and Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Mei S, Xiang J, Wang L, Xu Y, Li Z Ann Surg Open. 2024; 5(4):e522.

PMID: 39711659 PMC: 11661731. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000522.


The Dallas Donation after Circulatory Death Transplantation Summit: expanding donation after circulatory death procedures through process improvement, broader utilization, and innovation.

Finotti M, Wall A, DAlessandro A, Schwartz G, Sonnenday C, Goldberg D Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024; 13(5):824-836.

PMID: 39507724 PMC: 11534777. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-503.


Normothermic Regional Perfusion Experience of Organ Procurement Organizations in the US.

Sellers M, Philip J, Brubaker A, Cauwels R, Croome K, Hoffman J JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(10):e2440130.

PMID: 39446328 PMC: 11581661. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40130.


Advancements in Predictive Tools for Primary Graft Dysfunction in Liver Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review.

Gierej P, Radziszewski M, Figiel W, Grat M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999328 PMC: 11242128. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133762.


Normothermic regional perfusion in paediatric donation after circulatory determination of death-the Oxford position statement from ELPAT.

Brierley J, Perez-Blanco A, Stojanovic J, Kessaris N, Scales A, Paessler A Front Transplant. 2024; 3:1320783.

PMID: 38993761 PMC: 11235291. DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1320783.


References
1.
Washburn W, Johnson L, Lewis W, Jenkins R . Graft function and outcome of older (> or = 60 years) donor livers. Transplantation. 1996; 61(7):1062-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199604150-00013. View

2.
DAlessandro A, Hoffmann R, Knechtle S, Eckhoff D, Love R, Kalayoglu M . Successful extrarenal transplantation from non-heart-beating donors. Transplantation. 1995; 59(7):977-82. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199504150-00009. View

3.
Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Prats D, Torrente J, Perez-Contin M, Fernandez C, Alvarez J . Renal transplantation from non-heart beating donors: a promising alternative to enlarge the donor pool. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000; 11(2):350-358. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V112350. View

4.
Alvarez J, del Barrio R, Arias J, Ruiz F, Iglesias J, de Elias R . Non-heart-beating donors from the streets: an increasing donor pool source. Transplantation. 2000; 70(2):314-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200007270-00014. View

5.
DAlessandro A, Hoffmann R, Knechtle S, Odorico J, Becker Y, Musat A . Liver transplantation from controlled non-heart-beating donors. Surgery. 2000; 128(4):579-88. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.108421. View