» Articles » PMID: 16235610

Migration and Spatial Assimilation Among U.S. Latinos: Classical Versus Segmented Trajectories

Overview
Journal Demography
Specialty Public Health
Date 2005 Oct 21
PMID 16235610
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We used merged data from the Latino National Political Survey, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, and the U.S. census to examine patterns and determinants of interneighborhood residential mobility between 1990 and 1995 for 2,074 U.S. residents of Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban ethnicity. In several respects, our findings confirm the central tenets of spatial assimilation theory: Latino residential mobility into neighborhoods that are inhabited by greater percentages of non-Hispanic whites (i.e., Anglos) increases with human and financial capital and English-language use. However, these results also point to variations in the residential mobility process among Latinos that are broadly consistent with the segmented assimilation perspective on ethnic and immigrant incorporation. Net of controls, Puerto Ricans are less likely than Mexicans to move to neighborhoods with relatively large Anglo populations, and the generational and socioeconomic differences that are anticipated by the classical assimilation model emerge more strongly for Mexicans than for Puerto Ricans or Cubans. Among Puerto Ricans and Cubans, darker skin color inhibits mobility into Anglo neighborhoods.

Citing Articles

Racial residential segregation is associated with ambient air pollution exposure after adjustment for multilevel sociodemographic factors: Evidence from eight US-based cohorts.

Zewdie H, Fahey C, Harrington A, Hart J, Biggs M, McClure L Environ Epidemiol. 2025; 9(1):e367.

PMID: 39839804 PMC: 11749741. DOI: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000367.


Diverging trajectories of neighborhood disadvantage by race and birth cohort from childhood through young adulthood.

Candipan J, Sampson R PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0283641.

PMID: 37074992 PMC: 10115268. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283641.


The Role of Skin Color in Latino Social Networks: Color Homophily in Sending and Receiving Societies.

Roth W, Marin A Sociol Race Ethn (Thousand Oaks). 2021; 7(2):175-193.

PMID: 34368401 PMC: 8341391. DOI: 10.1177/2332649220940346.


Rethinking the Hispanic Paradox: The Mortality Experience of Mexican Immigrants in Traditional Gateways and New Destinations.

Fenelon A Int Migr Rev. 2020; 51(3):567-599.

PMID: 33110281 PMC: 7586780. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12263.


Does Skin Tone Matter? Immigrant Mobility in the U.S. Labor Market.

Han J Demography. 2020; 57(2):705-726.

PMID: 32198719 DOI: 10.1007/s13524-020-00867-7.


References
1.
Kritz M, Nogle J . Nativity concentration and internal migration among the foreign-born. Demography. 1994; 31(3):509-24. View

2.
Lee B, Oropesa R, Kanan J . Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography. 1994; 31(2):249-70. View

3.
Alba R, Logan J . Variations on two themes: racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography. 1991; 28(3):431-53. View

4.
Zhou M . Segmented assimilation: issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. Int Migr Rev. 1997; 31(4):975-1,008. View

5.
Massey D, Denton N . Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions. Demography. 1989; 26(3):373-91. View