Experimental Manipulation of Attentional Bias Increases the Motivation to Drink Alcohol

Overview

Journal Psychopharmacology (Berl)

Specialty Pharmacology

Date 2005 Oct 20

PMID 16235080

Citations 83

Authors

Matt Field

Brian Eastwood

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Rationale: Attentional bias for alcohol-related cues is associated with the motivation to drink alcohol, possibly because attentional bias increases craving.

Objectives: We examined whether an experimentally induced attentional bias would influence subjective and behavioural indices of the motivation to drink.

Methods: Heavy social drinkers (N=40) completed an attentional training procedure, in which half of the participants were trained to direct their attention towards alcohol-related cues ('attend alcohol'), and half of the participants were trained to direct their attention away from alcohol-related cues ('avoid alcohol'). After attentional training, participants rated their urge to drink alcohol, and the amount of beer consumed during a taste test was measured.

Results: The attentional training procedure produced significant changes in attentional bias in the predicted direction in both experimental groups. Attentional training produced an increase in the urge to drink alcohol in the attend alcohol group, and the attend alcohol group consumed more beer than the avoid alcohol group during the taste test.

Conclusions: These results suggest that a potentiated attentional bias for alcohol-related cues can increase the motivation to drink alcohol. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Attentional Bias Modification Combined With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Reducing Relapse Risk and Cravings in Male Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Amano Y, Koizumi K, Takizawa H, Tasaka S, Hamaguchi T Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025; 45(1):e70002.

PMID: 39907051 PMC: 11795173. DOI: 10.1002/npr2.70002.

The ad-libitum taste test as measure of momentary alcohol use in the laboratory: an investigation of construct validity and confounding factors.

Trautmann S, Kraplin A, Muehlhan M, Fuchs F, Loesch B, Wittgens C Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023; 241(5):913-923.

PMID: 38141076 PMC: 11031463. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06518-0.

Naltrexone engages a brain reward network in the presence of reward-predictive distractor stimuli in males.

Spencer C, Elton A, Dove S, Faulkner M, Robinson D, Boettiger C Addict Neurosci. 2023; 7.

PMID: 37424633 PMC: 10328541. DOI: 10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100085.

Underlying mechanisms in the relationship between stress and alcohol consumption in regular and risky drinkers (MESA): methods and design of a randomized laboratory study.

Wittgens C, Muehlhan M, Kraplin A, Wolff M, Trautmann S BMC Psychol. 2022; 10(1):233.

PMID: 36243742 PMC: 9568994. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-00942-1.

The who and how of attentional bias in cannabis users: associations with use severity, craving and interference control.

Kroon E, Kuhns L, Dunkerbeck A, Cousijn J Addiction. 2022; 118(2):307-316.

PMID: 36189776 PMC: 10091751. DOI: 10.1111/add.16059.

References

Carter B, Tiffany S . Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction. 1999; 94(3):327-40. View

Franken I . Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 27(4):563-79. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00081-2. View

Ehrman R, Robbins S, Bromwell M, Lankford M, Monterosso J, OBrien C . Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002; 67(2):185-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00065-0. View

Drobes D, Thomas S . Assessing craving for alcohol. Alcohol Res Health. 2000; 23(3):179-86. PMC: 6760375. View

Derryberry D, Reed M . Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002; 111(2):225-36. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.111.2.225. View

Wiers R, de Jong P, Havermans R, Jelicic M . How to change implicit drug use-related cognitions in prevention: a transdisciplinary integration of findings from experimental psychopathology, social cognition, memory, and experimental learning psychology. Subst Use Misuse. 2004; 39(10-12):1625-84. View

Townshend J, Duka T . Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001; 157(1):67-74. DOI: 10.1007/s002130100764. View

Mogg K, Bradley B . A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 1998; 36(9):809-48. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00063-1. View

Robinson T, Berridge K . Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002; 54:25-53. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145237. View

10.

Mogg K, Bradley B, Field M, De Houwer J . Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction. 2003; 98(6):825-36. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00392.x. View

11.

Field M, Mogg K, Bradley B . Eye movements to smoking-related cues: effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003; 173(1-2):116-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1689-2. View

12.

Lubman D, Peters L, Mogg K, Bradley B, Deakin J . Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence. Psychol Med. 2000; 30(1):169-75. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291799001269. View

13.

Jones B, Jones B, Smith H, Copley N . A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. Addiction. 2003; 98(2):235-44. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00270.x. View

14.

Rosse R, Johri S, Kendrick K, Hess A, Alim T, Miller M . Preattentive and attentive eye movements during visual scanning of a cocaine cue: correlation with intensity of cocaine cravings. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997; 9(1):91-3. DOI: 10.1176/jnp.9.1.91. View

15.

Watts F, McKenna F, Sharrock R, Trezise L . Colour naming of phobia-related words. Br J Psychol. 1986; 77 ( Pt 1):97-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb01985.x. View

16.

Macleod C, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L . Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002; 111(1):107-23. View

17.

Field M, Mogg K, Bradley B . Craving and cognitive biases for alcohol cues in social drinkers. Alcohol Alcohol. 2005; 40(6):504-10. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agh213. View

18.

Cox W, Hogan L, Kristian M, Race J . Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers' treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002; 68(3):237-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00219-3. View

19.

Edwards G . Sensible drinking. BMJ. 1996; 312(7022):1. PMC: 2349701. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7022.1. View

20.

Sharma D, Albery I, Cook C . Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers. Addiction. 2001; 96(2):285-95. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x. View