Allen T, Bancroft L, Wang K, Wang P, Unal O, Estkowski L
Tomography. 2023; 9(3):967-980.
PMID: 37218939
PMC: 10204486.
DOI: 10.3390/tomography9030079.
Levins K, Drago T, Roman E, Martin A, King R, Murphy P
Syst Rev. 2019; 8(1):338.
PMID: 31882014
PMC: 6935150.
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1256-5.
Daimiel I
J Breast Cancer. 2019; 22(2):155-171.
PMID: 31281720
PMC: 6597408.
DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e26.
Drago T, ORegan P, Welaratne I, Rooney S, OCallaghan A, Malkit M
Syst Rev. 2018; 7(1):158.
PMID: 30309391
PMC: 6182786.
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0830-6.
Diefenbach M, Ruschke S, Eggers H, Meineke J, Rummeny E, Karampinos D
Magn Reson Med. 2018; 80(3):990-1004.
PMID: 29424458
PMC: 6001469.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27097.
H-MR spectroscopy of suspicious breast mass lesions at 3T: a clinical experience.
Montemezzi S, Cavedon C, Camera L, Meliado G, Caumo F, Baglio I
Radiol Med. 2016; 122(3):161-170.
PMID: 27981485
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0713-7.
Distortion correction in diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: Performance assessment of prospective, retrospective, and combined (prospective + retrospective) approaches.
Hancu I, Lee S, Hulsey K, Lenkinski R, Holland D, Sperl J
Magn Reson Med. 2016; 78(1):247-253.
PMID: 27403765
PMC: 5233674.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26328.
Variability and bias assessment in breast ADC measurement across multiple systems.
Keenan K, Peskin A, Wilmes L, Aliu S, Jones E, Li W
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 44(4):846-55.
PMID: 27008431
PMC: 5098898.
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25237.
Detecting gas-induced vasomotor changes via blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast in healthy breast parenchyma and breast carcinoma.
Wallace T, Patterson A, Abeyakoon O, Bedair R, Manavaki R, McLean M
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 44(2):335-45.
PMID: 26898173
PMC: 4949641.
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25177.
Investigating the influence of flip angle and k-space sampling on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI breast examinations.
Ledger A, Borri M, Pope R, Scurr E, Wallace T, Richardson C
Acad Radiol. 2014; 21(11):1394-401.
PMID: 25179563
PMC: 4234081.
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.014.
Bilateral breast MRI by use of dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation and image-based shimming at 3 Tesla: improvement in homogeneity on fat-suppression imaging.
Ishizaka K, Kato F, Terae S, Mito S, Oyama-Manabe N, Kamishima T
Radiol Phys Technol. 2014; 8(1):4-12.
PMID: 24965916
DOI: 10.1007/s12194-014-0278-x.
Homogenous fat suppression for bilateral breast imaging using independent shims.
Han M, Cunningham C, Pauly J, Daniel B, Hargreaves B
Magn Reson Med. 2013; 71(4):1511-7.
PMID: 23821305
PMC: 4085331.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24803.
Dynamic slice-dependent shim and center frequency update in 3 T breast diffusion weighted imaging.
Lee S, Tan E, Govenkar A, Hancu I
Magn Reson Med. 2013; 71(5):1813-8.
PMID: 23798360
PMC: 3830606.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24824.
Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced examinations with fat suppression: are contrast-agent uptake curves affected by magnetic field inhomogeneity?.
Schmidt M, Borri M, Scurr E, Ertas G, Payne G, OFlynn E
Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(6):1537-45.
PMID: 23242002
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2735-4.
Subject-specific models of susceptibility-induced B0 field variations in breast MRI.
Jordan C, Daniel B, Koch K, Yu H, Conolly S, Hargreaves B
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 37(1):227-32.
PMID: 22865658
PMC: 3492544.
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23762.
Patient-to-patient variation of susceptibility-induced B₀ field in bilateral breast MRI.
Lee S, Hancu I
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 36(4):873-80.
PMID: 22689505
PMC: 3445786.
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23715.
On shimming approaches in 3T breast MRI.
Hancu I, Govenkar A, Lenkinski R, Lee S
Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(3):862-7.
PMID: 22556115
PMC: 3419817.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24307.
The feasibility of measuring phosphocreatine recovery kinetics in muscle using a single-shot (31)P RARE MRI sequence.
Greenman R, Smithline H
Acad Radiol. 2011; 18(7):917-23.
PMID: 21536463
PMC: 3115448.
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.014.
An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI.
Freed M, de Zwart J, Loud J, El Khouli R, Myers K, Greene M
Med Phys. 2011; 38(2):743-53.
PMID: 21452712
PMC: 3033878.
DOI: 10.1118/1.3533899.
Pyrolytic graphite foam: a passive magnetic susceptibility matching material.
Lee G, Goodwill P, Phuong K, Inglis B, Scott G, Hargreaves B
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 32(3):684-91.
PMID: 20815067
PMC: 3525090.
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22270.