Pneumoperitoneum Does Not Influence Trocar Site Implantation During Tumor Manipulation in a Solid Tumor Model
Overview
General Surgery
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess tumor implantation at abdominal wound sites following manipulation of a solid abdominal tumor.
Methods: GW-39 human colon cancer cells were injected into the omentum of golden Syrian hamsters. At 2 weeks, an omental tumor was harvested and animals were randomized to bivalve (A), crush (B), strip (C), or excision (D), with or without pneumoperitoneum. Four 5-mm trocars were inserted into the abdomen, and the tumor was reinserted through the midline, swept through four quadrants, and removed. The incision was closed and pneumoperitoneum at 7 mmHg was maintained for 10 min. Tumor implantation at wound sites was documented at 7 weeks.
Results: Implantation at trocar sites was 53 and 49% with and without pneumoperitoneum in the manipulated groups (A, B, C), respectively (p = 0.993). Implantation at trocar sites was reduced in the control group (D) at 9 and 10% with and without pneumoperitoneum, respectively (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Tumor implantation at trocar sites is due to spillage of tumor during manipulation and not to pneumoperitoneum.
Kim M, Jo S, Shim H Am J Case Rep. 2019; 20:1695-1698.
PMID: 31735909 PMC: 6878966. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.920451.
James Walter Fleshman Jr., MD: a conversation with the editor.
Fleshman Jr J, Roberts W Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2014; 27(3):263-75.
PMID: 24982584 PMC: 4059588. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2014.11929133.
Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: forgotten or missed.
Kadi N, Isherwood M, Al-Akraa M, Williams S Adv Urol. 2012; 2012:609531.
PMID: 22611383 PMC: 3349242. DOI: 10.1155/2012/609531.