» Articles » PMID: 16207323

DAS28 Best Reflects the Physician's Clinical Judgment of Response to Infliximab Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Validation of the DAS28 Score in Patients Under Infliximab Treatment

Abstract

This study is based on an expanded access program in which 511 patients suffering from active refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with intravenous infusions of infliximab (3 mg/kg+methotrexate (MTX)) at weeks 0, 2, 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter. At week 22, 474 patients were still in follow-up, of whom 102 (21.5%), who were not optimally responding to treatment, received a dose increase from week 30 onward. We aimed to build a model to discriminate the decision to give a dose increase. This decision was based on the treating rheumatologist's clinical judgment and therefore can be considered as a clinical measure of insufficient response. Different single and composite measures at weeks 0, 6, 14 and 22, and their differences over time were taken into account for the model building. Ranking of the continuous variables based on areas under the curve of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, displayed the momentary DAS28 (Disease Activity Score including a 28-joint count) as the most important discriminating variable. Subsequently, we proved that the response scores and the changes over time were less important than the momentary evaluations to discriminate the physician's decision. The final model we thus obtained was a model with only slightly better discriminative characteristics than the DAS28. Finally, we fitted a discriminant function using the single variables of the DAS28. This displayed similar scores and coefficients as the DAS28. In conclusion, we evaluated different variables and models to discriminate the treating rheumatologist's decision to increase the dose of infliximab (+MTX), which indicates an insufficient response to infliximab at 3 mg/kg in patients with RA. We proved that the momentary DAS28 score correlates best with this decision and demonstrated the robustness of the score and the coefficients of the DAS28 in a cohort of RA patients under infliximab therapy.

Citing Articles

Application of disease activity index in rheumatoid arthritis management in Korea.

Choi S, Cho S, Sung Y J Rheum Dis. 2024; 31(4):193-199.

PMID: 39355548 PMC: 11439630. DOI: 10.4078/jrd.2024.0077.


Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a proposed biosimilar MSB11456 with tocilizumab reference product in subjects with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised double-blind study.

Zubrzycka-Sienkiewicz A, Klama K, Ullmann M, Petit-Frere C, Baker P, Monnet J RMD Open. 2024; 10(1).

PMID: 38316489 PMC: 11148666. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003596.


Defining the Optimal Strategies for Achieving Drug-Free Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.

Gul H, Harnden K, Saleem B Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(12).

PMID: 34946453 PMC: 8701994. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9121726.


Value of Remission in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Targeted Review.

Ostor A, Sawant R, Qi C, Wu A, Nagy O, Betts K Adv Ther. 2021; 39(1):75-93.

PMID: 34787822 PMC: 8799574. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01946-w.


Rheumatoid Arthritis disease activity assessment in routine care: performance of the most widely used composite disease activity indices and patient-reported outcome measures.

Salaffi F, Di Carlo M, Farah S, Marotto D, Atzeni F, Sarzi-Puttini P Acta Biomed. 2021; 92(4):e2021238.

PMID: 34487094 PMC: 8477094. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i4.10831.


References
1.
Maini R, St Clair E, Breedveld F, Furst D, Kalden J, Weisman M . Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. ATTRACT Study Group. Lancet. 2000; 354(9194):1932-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)05246-0. View

2.
Gossec L, Dougados M, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Sibilia J, Meyer O . Prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis: a multiparameter prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004; 63(6):675-80. PMC: 1755028. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2003.010611. View

3.
Welsing P, Landewe R, van Riel P, Boers M, van Gestel A, van der Linden S . The relationship between disease activity and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 50(7):2082-93. DOI: 10.1002/art.20350. View

4.
Salaffi F, Peroni M, Ferraccioli G . Discriminating ability of composite indices for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of the Chronic Arthritis Systemic Index, Disease Activity Score and Thompson's articular index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000; 39(1):90-6. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.1.90. View

5.
Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A, McMahon A, Lock P, Vallance R . Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364(9430):263-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16676-2. View