Huang C, van Moorselaar D, Foster J, Donk M, Theeuwes J
Elife. 2025; 13.
PMID: 40008864
PMC: 11864755.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.98304.
Sapountzis P, Antoniadou A, Gregoriou G
PLoS Biol. 2025; 23(1):e3003008.
PMID: 39869632
PMC: 11801722.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003008.
Moher J, Leber A
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(2):303-315.
PMID: 39794653
PMC: 11865179.
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-03004-3.
Xu Z, Theeuwes J, Los S
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(2):431-444.
PMID: 39789241
PMC: 11865177.
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02992-6.
Busel C, Dahm S, Sachse P, Ansorge U
Psychol Res. 2025; 89(1):43.
PMID: 39760905
PMC: 11703931.
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02073-1.
Words before pictures: the role of language in biasing visual attention.
Calignano G, Lorenzoni A, Semeraro G, Navarrete E
Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1439397.
PMID: 39744025
PMC: 11688633.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1439397.
Reliably measuring learning-dependent distractor suppression with eye tracking.
Kim A, Gregoire L, Anderson B
Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):18.
PMID: 39695027
PMC: 11655588.
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02552-8.
Dimension-based retro-cue benefit in working memory does not require unfocused dimension removal.
Liu R, Guo L, Lin X, Nie D, Astikainen P, Ye C
Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1433405.
PMID: 39554712
PMC: 11566143.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433405.
Coupling of saccade plans to endogenous attention during urgent choices.
Goldstein A, Stanford T, Salinas E
Elife. 2024; 13.
PMID: 39495217
PMC: 11534328.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97883.
The temporal dynamics of visual attention.
Zhang H, Sellers J, Lee T, Jonides J
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024; 154(2):435-456.
PMID: 39361368
PMC: 11790386.
DOI: 10.1037/xge0001661.
Complex trade-offs in a dual-target visual search task are indexed by lateralised ERP components.
Henare D, Tunnermann J, Wagner I, Schutz A, Schubo A
Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22839.
PMID: 39353965
PMC: 11448495.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72811-3.
Cue relevance drives early quitting in visual search.
Moher J, Delos Reyes A, Drew T
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):54.
PMID: 39183257
PMC: 11345343.
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00587-1.
Characteristics of Visual Cognition in Patients with Anoxic Encephalopathy: An Eye-tracking Study.
Nakajima Y, Takahashi N, Kawabata K, Fujita K, Shiomi K, Sato M
Prog Rehabil Med. 2024; 9:20240024.
PMID: 39081543
PMC: 11284244.
DOI: 10.2490/prm.20240024.
Laminar multi-contrast fMRI at 7T allows differentiation of neuronal excitation and inhibition underlying positive and negative BOLD responses.
Shao X, Guo F, Kim J, Ress D, Zhao C, Shou Q
medRxiv. 2024; .
PMID: 39040201
PMC: 11261924.
DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.01.24305167.
What is the Role of Spatial Attention in Statistical Learning During Visual Search?.
Golan A, Ramgir A, Lamy D
J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):52.
PMID: 39005952
PMC: 11243762.
DOI: 10.5334/joc.382.
Prospective Distractor Information Reduces Reward-Related Attentional Capture.
Mahlberg J, Pearson D, Le Pelley M, Watson P
J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):50.
PMID: 38910876
PMC: 11192094.
DOI: 10.5334/joc.375.
Attention deployment in natural scenes: Higher-order scene statistics rather than semantics modulate the N2pc component.
Walper D, Bendixen A, Grimm S, Schubo A, Einhauser W
J Vis. 2024; 24(6):7.
PMID: 38848099
PMC: 11166226.
DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.6.7.
The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: singleton vs. multiple distractors.
Smith E, Crawford T
Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(7):1745-1759.
PMID: 38819649
PMC: 11208228.
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3.
Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.
Kim A, Senior J, Chu S, Mather M
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024; 153(7):1938-1959.
PMID: 38780565
PMC: 11250690.
DOI: 10.1037/xge0001602.
Baseline Pupil Size Seems Unrelated to Fluid Intelligence, Working Memory Capacity, and Attentional Control.
Ruuskanen V, Hagen T, Espeseth T, Mathot S
J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):41.
PMID: 38737819
PMC: 11086595.
DOI: 10.5334/joc.365.