» Articles » PMID: 16199245

Cardiovascular Safety of Lumiracoxib: a Meta-analysis of All Randomized Controlled Trials > or =1 Week and Up to 1 Year in Duration of Patients with Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Overview
Journal Clin Ther
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2005 Oct 4
PMID 16199245
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The cardiovascular (CV) safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors has been the subject of considerable debate.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the risk of CV events with lumiracoxib by meta-analysis of all completed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of > or =1 week and up to 1 year in duration of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: The Novartis Lumiracoxib Clinical Trial Database, which includes all clinical studies conducted to date with lumiracoxib, was reviewed. Data were extracted from RCTs of > or =1 week and up to 1 year in duration, the maximum study duration; 34,668 patients were included in standard and cumulative meta-analyses. Twenty-two RCTs of lumiracoxib 100 to 1200 mg daily were identified; 22,781 patients were included in 1-year trials. Mean age of the patients was 61.5 years and 74% were female. More than 50% of the patients in these studies had hypertension at baseline and 6% had diabetes. Parameters analyzed were the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC) composite CV end point of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), and CV death; MI alone; and stroke alone. Twenty-one of the 22 RCTs have been published.

Results: For all 3 parameters, relative risk (RR) was calculated versus non-naproxen NSAIDs, naproxen, and placebo. The results were as follows: for the APTC end point versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.46-1.51; versus naproxen: RR 1.49, 95% CI, 0.94-2.36; versus placebo: RR 1.08, 95% CI, 0.41-2.86; for MI alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.28-2.25; versus naproxen: RR 1.69, 95% CI, 0.82-3.48; versus placebo: RR 1.27, 95% CI, 0.25-6.56; and for stroke alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.35-2.35; versus naproxen: RR 1.42, 95% CI, 0.70-2.91; versus placebo: RR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.13-2.74. Cumulative meta-analyses of lumiracoxib versus all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen) did not find any significant differences in APTC, MI alone, or stroke alone.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis of 34,668 patients receiving > or =1 week and up to 1 year of treatment found no evidence that lumiracoxib was associated with a significant increase in CV risk compared with naproxen, placebo, or all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen).

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Massage for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Perlman A, Fogerite S, Glass O, Bechard E, Ali A, Njike V J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 34(3):379-386.

PMID: 30543021 PMC: 6420526. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4763-5.


Tolerability of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors used for the treatment of rheumatological manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease.

Miao X, Li J, OuYang Q, Hu R, Zhang Y, Li H Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (10):CD007744.

PMID: 25340915 PMC: 11200115. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007744.pub2.


Accumulating research: a systematic account of how cumulative meta-analyses would have provided knowledge, improved health, reduced harm and saved resources.

Clarke M, Brice A, Chalmers I PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e102670.

PMID: 25068257 PMC: 4113310. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102670.


Zhuanggu Jianxi Decoction () limits interleukin-1 β-induced degeneration chondrocytes via the caveolin-p38 MAPK signal pathway.

Yan H, Su Y, Lin X, Chen B, Zhang Q, Zhang Z Chin J Integr Med. 2014; 20(5):353-9.

PMID: 24481743 DOI: 10.1007/s11655-014-1801-y.


Synergistic interaction between metformin and sulfonylureas on diclofenac-induced antinociception measured using the formalin test in rats.

Ortiz M Pain Res Manag. 2013; 18(5):253-8.

PMID: 23985578 PMC: 3805348. DOI: 10.1155/2013/579183.