» Articles » PMID: 16196058

Standard Assays Do Not Predict the Efficiency of Commercial Cellulase Preparations Towards Plant Materials

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2005 Oct 1
PMID 16196058
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Commercial cellulase preparations are potentially effective for processing biomass feedstocks in order to obtain bioethanol. In plant cell walls, cellulose fibrils occur in close association with xylans (monocotyls) or xyloglucans (dicotyls). The enzymatic conversion of cellulose/xylans is a complex process involving the concerted action of exo/endocellulases and cellobiases yielding glucose and xylanases yielding xylooligomers and xylose. An overview of commonly measured cellulase-, cellobiase-, and xylanase-activity, using respectively filter paper, cellobiose, and AZCL-dyed xylan as a substrate of 14 commercially available enzyme preparations from several suppliers is presented. In addition to these standardized tests, the enzyme-efficiency of degrading native substrates was studied. Grass and wheat bran were fractionated into a water unsoluble fraction (WUS), which was free of oligosaccharides and starch. Additionally, cellulose- and xylan-rich fractions were prepared by alkaline extraction of the WUS and were enzymatically digested. Hereby, the capability of cellulose and xylan conversion of the commercial enzyme preparations tested was measured. The results obtained showed that there was a large difference in the performance of the fourteen enzyme samples. Comparing all results, it was concluded that the choice of an enzyme preparation is more dependent on the characteristics of the substrate rather than on standard enzyme-activities measured.

Citing Articles

Co-production of sugars and aroma compounds from tobacco waste using biomass-degrading enzymes produced by Aspergillus brunneoviolaceus Ab-10.

Zhang Y, Waghmare P, Zhang Z, Gao L Arch Microbiol. 2024; 206(7):291.

PMID: 38849576 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-024-03972-y.


Enzymatic processing of lignocellulosic biomass: principles, recent advances and perspectives.

Ostby H, Hansen L, Horn S, Eijsink V, Varnai A J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020; 47(9-10):623-657.

PMID: 32840713 PMC: 7658087. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-020-02301-8.


Quantification of Lignin and Its Structural Features in Plant Biomass Using C Lignin as Internal Standard for Pyrolysis-GC-SIM-MS.

van Erven G, de Visser R, Merkx D, Strolenberg W, de Gijsel P, Gruppen H Anal Chem. 2017; 89(20):10907-10916.

PMID: 28926698 PMC: 5647568. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02632.


Optimization of carboxymethylcellulase production from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SS35.

Singh S, Moholkar V, Goyal A 3 Biotech. 2017; 4(4):411-424.

PMID: 28324477 PMC: 4145630. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0169-6.


Production of l(+)-lactic acid from acid pretreated sugarcane bagasse using DSM2314 in a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation strategy.

van der Pol E, Eggink G, Weusthuis R Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016; 9:248.

PMID: 27872661 PMC: 5111225. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0646-3.