» Articles » PMID: 16193269

Perceived Timing of First- and Second-order Changes in Vision and Hearing

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2005 Sep 30
PMID 16193269
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Simultaneous changes in visual stimulus attributes (such as motion or color) are often perceived to occur at different times, a fact usually attributed to differences in neural processing times of those attributes. However, other studies suggest that perceptual misalignments are not due to stimulus attributes, but to the type of change, first- or second-order. To test whether this idea generalizes across modalities, we studied perceptual synchrony of acoustic and of audiovisual cross-modal stimuli, which varied in a first- or second-order fashion. First-order changes were abrupt changes in tone intensity or frequency (auditory), or spatial position (visual), while second-order changes were an inversion of the direction of change, such as a turning point when a rising tone starts falling or a translating visual blob reverses. For both pure acoustic and cross-modal stimuli, first-order changes were systematically perceived before second-order changes. However, when both changes were first-order, or both were second-order, little or no difference in perceptual delay was found between them, regardless of attribute or modality. This shows that the type of attribute change, as well as latency differences, is a strong determinant of subjective temporal alignments. We also performed an analysis of reaction times (RTs) to the first- and second-order attribute changes used in these temporal alignment experiments. RT differences between these stimuli did not correspond with our temporal alignment data, suggesting that subjective alignments cannot be accounted for by a simple latency-based explanation.

Citing Articles

Simultaneity learning in vision, audition, tactile sense and their cross-modal combinations.

Virsu V, Oksanen-Hennah H, Vedenpaa A, Jaatinen P, Lahti-Nuuttila P Exp Brain Res. 2008; 186(4):525-37.

PMID: 18183376 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1254-z.


Visual search for a target changing in synchrony with an auditory signal.

Fujisaki W, Koene A, Arnold D, Johnston A, Nishida S Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 273(1588):865-74.

PMID: 16618681 PMC: 1560215. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3327.


Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision.

Harrar V, Harris L Exp Brain Res. 2005; 166(3-4):465-73.

PMID: 16028031 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2386-7.

References
1.
Kopinska A, Harris L . Simultaneity constancy. Perception. 2004; 33(9):1049-60. DOI: 10.1068/p5169. View

2.
Shore D, Spence C, Klein R . Visual prior entry. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(3):205-12. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00337. View

3.
Arnold D, Clifford C, Wenderoth P . Asynchronous processing in vision: color leads motion. Curr Biol. 2001; 11(8):596-600. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00156-7. View

4.
Nishida S, Johnston A . Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Curr Biol. 2002; 12(5):359-68. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00698-x. View

5.
Zampini M, Shore D, Spence C . Audiovisual temporal order judgments. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 152(2):198-210. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1536-z. View