» Articles » PMID: 16191634

Host-parasitoid Spatial Ecology: a Plea for a Landscape-level Synthesis

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2005 Sep 30
PMID 16191634
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A growing body of literature points to a large-scale research approach as essential for understanding population and community ecology. Many of our advances regarding the spatial ecology of predators and prey can be attributed to research with insect parasitoids and their hosts. In this review, we focus on the progress that has been made in the study of the movement and population dynamics of hosts and their parasitoids in heterogeneous landscapes, and how this research approach may be beneficial to pest management programs. To date, few studies have quantified prey and predator rates and ranges of dispersal and population dynamics at the patch level--the minimum of information needed to characterize population structure. From host-parasitoid studies with sufficient data, it is clear that the spatial scale of dispersal can differ significantly between a prey and its predators, local prey extinctions can be attributed to predators and predator extinction risk at the patch level often exceeds that of the prey. It is also evident that populations can be organized as a single, highly connected (patchy) population or as semi-independent extinction-prone local populations that collectively form a persistent metapopulation. A prey and its predators can also differ in population structure. At the landscape level, agricultural studies indicate that predator effects on its prey often spill over between the crop and surrounding area (matrix) and can depend strongly on landscape structure (e.g. the proportion of suitable habitat) at scales extending well beyond the crop margins. In light of existing empirical data, predator-prey models are typically spatially unrealistic, lacking important details on boundary responses and movement behaviour within and among patches. The tools exist for conducting empirical and theoretical research at the landscape level and we hope that this review calls attention to fertile areas for future exploration.

Citing Articles

Fundamental limits of parasitoid-driven host population suppression: Implications for biological control.

Singh A PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295980.

PMID: 38134026 PMC: 10745201. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295980.


Density-dependent within-patch movement behavior of two competing species.

Cronin J, Goddard 2nd J, Krivchenia A, Shivaji R Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(11):e10753.

PMID: 38020706 PMC: 10659955. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10753.


A double-spiral maze and hi-resolution tracking pipeline to study dispersal by groups of minute insects.

Cointe M, Burte V, Perez G, Mailleret L, Calcagno V Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5200.

PMID: 36997620 PMC: 10063622. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31630-8.


Effect of Organic Farming and Agricultural Abandonment on Beneficial Arthropod Communities Associated with Olive Groves in Western Spain: Implications for Management.

Paz V, Tobajas E, Rosas-Ramos N, Tormos J, Asis J, Banos-Picon L Insects. 2022; 13(1).

PMID: 35055891 PMC: 8778029. DOI: 10.3390/insects13010048.


Co-occurrence in ant primary parasitoids: a colony as host of two eucharitid wasp genera.

Perez-Lachaud G, Lachaud J PeerJ. 2021; 9:e11949.

PMID: 34466288 PMC: 8380026. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11949.


References
1.
Thies , Tscharntke . Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems . Science. 1999; 285(5429):893-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5429.893. View

2.
Landis D, Wratten S, Gurr G . Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000; 45:175-201. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175. View

3.
Hanski I, Ovaskainen O . The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature. 2000; 404(6779):755-8. DOI: 10.1038/35008063. View

4.
Ellner S, McCauley E, Kendall B, Briggs C, Hosseini P, WOOD S . Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community. Nature. 2001; 412(6846):538-43. DOI: 10.1038/35087580. View

5.
Donahue M, Holyoak M, Feng C . Patterns of dispersal and dynamics among habitat patches varying in quality. Am Nat. 2003; 162(3):302-17. DOI: 10.1086/377185. View