» Articles » PMID: 16188605

Adaptive Sex Differences in Growth of Pre-ovulation Oocytes in a Passerine Bird

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2005 Sep 29
PMID 16188605
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Maternal modification of offspring sex in birds has strong fitness consequences, however the mechanisms by which female birds can bias sex of their progeny in close concordance with the environment of breeding are not known. In recently established populations of house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus), breeding females lay a sex-biased sequence of eggs when ambient temperature causes early onset of incubation. We studied the mechanisms behind close association of incubation and sex-determination strategies in this species and discovered that pre-ovulation oocytes that produce males and females differed strongly in the temporal patterns of proliferation and growth. In turn, sex-specific exposure of oocytes to maternal secretion of prolactin and androgens produced distinct accumulation of maternal steroids in oocyte yolks in relation to oocyte proliferation order. These findings suggest that sex difference in oocyte growth and egg-laying sequence is an adaptive outcome of hormonal constraints imposed by the overlap of early incubation and oogenesis in this population, and that the close integration of maternal incubation, oocytes' sex-determination and growth might be under control of the same hormonal mechanism. We further document that population establishment and the evolution of these maternal strategies is facilitated by their strong effects on female and offspring fitness in a recently established part of the species range.

Citing Articles

Does paternal immunocompetence affect offspring vulnerability to maternal androgens? A study in domestic chickens.

Lelono A, Robledo-Ruiz D, Berghof T, Parmentier H, Riedstra B, Groothuis T Biol Open. 2019; 8(11).

PMID: 31748241 PMC: 6899007. DOI: 10.1242/bio.045096.


Seasonal shifts in sex ratios are mediated by maternal effects and fluctuating incubation temperatures.

Carter A, Bowden R, Paitz R Funct Ecol. 2017; 31(4):876-884.

PMID: 28584392 PMC: 5456293. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12801.


Social instability in laying quail: consequences on yolk steroids and offspring's phenotype.

Guibert F, Richard-Yris M, Lumineau S, Kotrschal K, Guemene D, Bertin A PLoS One. 2010; 5(11):e14069.

PMID: 21124926 PMC: 2989911. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014069.


No evidence for selective follicle abortion underlying primary sex ratio adjustment in pigeons.

Goerlich V, Dijkstra C, Groothuis T Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2010; 64(4):599-606.

PMID: 20174439 PMC: 2820215. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0877-4.


Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: an empirical test of the Baldwin effect.

Badyaev A Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1520):1125-41.

PMID: 19324617 PMC: 2666683. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0285.


References
1.
Rozenboim I, Tabibzadeh C, Silsby J, El Halawani M . Effect of ovine prolactin administration on hypothalamic vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), gonadotropin releasing hormone I and II content, and anterior pituitary VIP receptors in laying turkey hens. Biol Reprod. 1993; 48(6):1246-50. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod48.6.1246. View

2.
Sockman K, Schwabl H . Daily estradiol and progesterone levels relative to laying and onset of incubation in canaries. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999; 114(2):257-68. DOI: 10.1006/gcen.1999.7252. View

3.
Tabibzadeh C, Rozenboim I, Silsby J, Pitts G, Foster D, El Halawani M . Modulation of ovarian cytochrome P450 17 alpha-hydroxylase and cytochrome aromatase messenger ribonucleic acid by prolactin in the domestic turkey. Biol Reprod. 1995; 52(3):600-8. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod52.3.600. View

4.
Krackow S . Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995; 70(2):225-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01066.x. View

5.
Krackow S . The developmental asynchrony hypothesis for sex ratio manipulation. J Theor Biol. 1995; 176(2):273-80. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0197. View