» Articles » PMID: 16188581

Pacemaker-related Myocardial Perfusion Defects Worsen During Higher Pacing Rate and Coronary Flow Augmentation

Overview
Journal Heart Rhythm
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2005 Sep 29
PMID 16188581
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Asynchronous activation resulting from right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing can adversely affect left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion despite normal coronary arteries. This situation makes detection of coronary heart disease in paced patients difficult.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the distribution, extent, and severity of myocardial perfusion defects with RVA pacing at low and high rates and increased coronary blood flow with adenosine.

Methods: Fourteen patients with permanent RVA pacing and angiographically normal coronary arteries underwent myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography at rest at low and high pacing rates and with pacing at low rates with adenosine. Data were analyzed semi-quantitatively using a 20-segment scoring model and coded using a four-point scoring system.

Results: At rest, 23 (55%) of 42 coronary flow territories showed abnormal perfusion and 52 (19%) of 280 corresponding segments demonstrated abnormal perfusion; mean perfusion score was 0.22. After high-rate pacing, perfusion was abnormal in 31 (74%) of 42 flow territories and 122 (44%) of 280 segments; mean perfusion score was 0.67. Adenosine infusion resulted in 28 (67%) of 42 abnormal flow territories and 90 (32%) of 280 abnormal segments; mean perfusion score was 0.44. Perfusion defects were observed most often in close proximity to the origin of the pacing site.

Conclusion: RVA pacing results in myocardial perfusion defects. The false-positive findings are present at rest and more obvious with high-rate pacing than during adenosine infusion. Detection of coronary artery disease should be performed with caution in RVA paced patients because of the high number of perfusion defects observed in the absence of coronary artery disease.

Citing Articles

Which Patients with AV Block Should Receive CRT Pacing?.

Tanawuttiwat T, Cheng A Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2014; 16(3):291.

PMID: 24496966 DOI: 10.1007/s11936-013-0291-0.


Patients with left bundle branch block pattern and high cardiac risk myocardial SPECT: does the current management suffice?.

Ten Cate T, Kelder J, Plokker H, Verzijlbergen J, van Hemel N Neth Heart J. 2011; 21(3):118-24.

PMID: 21695525 PMC: 3578532. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-011-0174-5.


Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future coronary events.

Ten Cate T, Kelder J, Plokker H, Verzijlbergen J, van Hemel N J Nucl Cardiol. 2009; 17(2):216-24.

PMID: 20033856 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9183-9.


Selective site pacing: rationale and practical application.

Parekh S, Stein K Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008; 10(5):351-9.

PMID: 18715531 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-008-0057-6.