Method for Cortical Bone Structural Analysis from Magnetic Resonance Images

Overview

Journal Acad Radiol

Specialty Radiology

Date 2005 Sep 24

PMID 16179209

Citations 10

Authors

Bryon R Gomberg

Punam K Saha

Felix W Wehrli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone architecture as a means to assess bone strength typically is accomplished on the basis of images obtained by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or computed tomography. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has potential advantages for this task in that it allows imaging in arbitrary scan planes at high spatial resolution. However, several hurdles have to be overcome to make this approach practical, including resolution of issues related to nonlinear receive coil sensitivity, variations in marrow composition, and the presence of periosteal isointense tissues, which all complicate segmentation. The aim of this study is to develop MR acquisition and analysis methods optimized for the detection of cortical boundaries in such complex geometries as the femoral neck.

Materials And Methods: Cortical boundary detection is achieved by radially tracing intensity profiles that intersect the periosteal and endosteal boundaries of bone. Profiles subsequently are normalized to the intensity of the marrow signal, processed with morphologic image operators, and binarized. The resulting boundaries are mapped back onto the spatial image, and erroneous boundary points are removed. From the detected cortical boundaries, cortical cross-sectional area and thickness are computed. The method was evaluated on cortical bone specimens and human volunteers on the basis of high-resolution images acquired at a 1.5-Tesla field strength. To assess whether the method is sensitive to detect the expected dependencies of cortical parameters in weight-bearing bone on overall habitus, 10 women aged 46-73 years (mean age, 56 years) underwent the cortical imaging protocol in the proximal femur, and results were compared with DXA bone mineral density parameters of the hip and spine.

Results: Reproducibility was approximately 2%. Double oblique images of the femoral neck in the 10 women studied showed that cortical cross-sectional area correlated strongly with height (r = 0.88; p = .0008), whereas cortical diameter versus age approached significance (r = 0.61; p = .06). Measurements in specimens of some cortical parameters indicated resolution dependence. However, note that specimen ranking within each parameter remained constant across all resolutions studied.

Conclusion: Data suggest the new method to be robust and applicable on standard clinical MR scanners at arbitrary anatomic locations to yield clinically meaningful quantitative results.

Citing Articles

Automated cortical bone segmentation for multirow-detector CT imaging with validation and application to human studies.

Li C, Jin D, Chen C, Letuchy E, Janz K, Burns T Med Phys. 2015; 42(8):4553-65.

PMID: 26233184 PMC: 4499051. DOI: 10.1118/1.4923753.

Novel assessment tools for osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment.

Gong B, Mandair G, Wehrli F, Morris M Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2014; 12(3):357-65.

PMID: 24879507 PMC: 6218937. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-014-0215-2.

Accuracy verification of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology for lower-limb prosthetic research: utilising animal soft tissue specimen and common socket casting materials.

Safari M, Rowe P, Buis A ScientificWorldJournal. 2012; 2012:156186.

PMID: 22619599 PMC: 3349102. DOI: 10.1100/2012/156186.

Radiological diagnostic progress in skeletal diseases.

Guglielmi G, Nasuto M, La Porta M Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2012; 8(1):13-6.

PMID: 22461797 PMC: 3230917.

Noninvasive imaging of bone microarchitecture.

Patsch J, Burghardt A, Kazakia G, Majumdar S Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011; 1240:77-87.

PMID: 22172043 PMC: 4461066. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06282.x.

References

Wehrli F, Leonard M, Saha P, Gomberg B . Quantitative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging reveals structural implications of renal osteodystrophy on trabecular and cortical bone. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20(1):83-9. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20085. View

Sepponen R, Sipponen J, Tanttu J . A method for chemical shift imaging: demonstration of bone marrow involvement with proton chemical shift imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984; 8(4):585-7. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198408000-00001. View

Basu P, Beall A, Simmons D, Vannier M . 3-D femoral stress analysis using CT scans and p-version FEM. Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs. 1985; 13(3-4):163-86. DOI: 10.3109/10731198509118849. View

Weissman B . Osteoporosis: radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures. Public Health Rep. 1987; 102(4 Suppl):127-31. PMC: 1478009. View

Beck T, Ruff C, Warden K, Scott Jr W, Rao G . Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. Invest Radiol. 1990; 25(1):6-18. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199001000-00004. View

Khosla S, Lufkin E, Hodgson S, Fitzpatrick L, Melton 3rd L . Epidemiology and clinical features of osteoporosis in young individuals. Bone. 1994; 15(5):551-5. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)90280-1. View

Gilsanz V, Kovanlikaya A, Costin G, Roe T, Sayre J, Kaufman F . Differential effect of gender on the sizes of the bones in the axial and appendicular skeletons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997; 82(5):1603-7. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.82.5.3942. View

Lang T, Keyak J, Heitz M, Augat P, Lu Y, Mathur A . Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. Bone. 1997; 21(1):101-8. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00072-0. View

Lang T, Augat P, Majumdar S, Ouyang X, Genant H . Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Bone. 1998; 22(5 Suppl):149S-153S. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00005-2. View

10.

Parfitt A . A structural approach to renal bone disease. J Bone Miner Res. 1998; 13(8):1213-20. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1213. View

11.

Peacock M, Liu G, Carey M, Ambrosius W, Turner C, Hui S . Bone mass and structure at the hip in men and women over the age of 60 years. Osteoporos Int. 1998; 8(3):231-9. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050059. View

12.

Grampp S, Henk C, Imhof H . CT and MR assessment of osteoporosis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1999; 20(1):2-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2171(99)90001-x. View

13.

Rauch F, Klein K, Allolio B, Schonau E . Age at menarche and cortical bone geometry in premenopausal women. Bone. 1999; 25(1):69-73. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00104-0. View

14.

Michelotti J, Clark J . Femoral neck length and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res. 1999; 14(10):1714-20. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.10.1714. View

15.

Shrout P, Fleiss J . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86(2):420-8. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420. View

16.

Horikoshi T, Endo N, Uchiyama T, Tanizawa T, Takahashi H . Peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the femoral neck in 60 Japanese women. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999; 65(6):447-53. DOI: 10.1007/s002239900731. View

17.

Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Gualtieri G, Malavolta N . Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women. Br J Radiol. 2000; 72(860):729-33. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.860.10624337. View

18.

Kardinaal A, Hoorneman G, Vaananen K, Charles P, Ando S, Maggiolini M . Determinants of bone mass and bone geometry in adolescent and young adult women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2000; 66(2):81-9. DOI: 10.1007/pl00005834. View

19.

Steiniche T, Christiansen P, Vesterby A, Ullerup R, Hessov I, Mosekilde L . Primary hyperparathyroidism: bone structure, balance, and remodeling before and 3 years after surgical treatment. Bone. 2000; 26(5):535-43. DOI: 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00260-X. View

20.

Alonso C, Curiel M, Carranza F, Cano R, Perez A . Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(8):714-20. View