» Articles » PMID: 16177413

Impact of Computer-aided Detection in a Regional Screening Mammography Program

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2005 Sep 24
PMID 16177413
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to prospectively assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on screening outcomes in a regional mammography program.

Materials And Methods: Between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000, 27,274 consecutive screenings were performed. Radiologists' performance before CAD (n = 7,872) and with CAD (n = 19,402) was determined by annual audits. All positive biopsy results were reviewed; histopathology was reviewed and confirmed. Outcomes (recall, biopsy, and cancer detection rates) with CAD (1999, 2000) were compared with historical control data (1998).

Results: With CAD, increases were seen in recall rate (8.1%, from 7.7% to 8.3%), biopsy rate (6.7%, from 1.4% to 1.5%), and cancer detection rate (16.1%, from 3.7 per 1,000 to 4.3 per 1,000). Detection rate of invasive cancers of 1.0 cm or less increased 164% (from 0.508 to 1.34 per 1,000 screens; p = 0.069). Detection rate of in situ cancers declined 6.7% (from 1.27 to 1.19 per 1,000; p = 0.849). In multivariable analysis of invasive cancers, early stage (stage I) was strongly associated with detection by CAD (odds ratio = 4.13, p = 0.025). Mean age at screening detection of cancer was 5.3 years younger in the CAD group than in the pre-CAD group (p = 0.060).

Conclusion: Increased detection rate, younger age at diagnosis, and significantly earlier stage of invasive cancer detection are consistent with a positive screening impact of CAD. Audit results were positive but generally not statistically significant due to sample size limitations. Our findings support the hypothesis that screening with CAD significantly improves detection of the specific cancer morphologies that CAD algorithms were designed to detect.

Citing Articles

Examining external control arms in oncology: A scoping review of applications to date.

Farah E, Kenney M, Warkentin M, Cheung W, Brenner D Cancer Med. 2024; 13(13):e7447.

PMID: 38984669 PMC: 11234289. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7447.


A deep learning-based automated diagnostic system for classifying mammographic lesions.

Yamaguchi T, Inoue K, Tsunoda H, Uematsu T, Shinohara N, Mukai H Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(27):e20977.

PMID: 32629712 PMC: 7337553. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020977.


Reduction of False-Positive Markings on Mammograms: a Retrospective Comparison Study Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based CAD.

Mayo R, Kent D, Sen L, Kapoor M, Leung J, Watanabe A J Digit Imaging. 2019; 32(4):618-624.

PMID: 30963339 PMC: 6646646. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0168-6.


Machine Meets Biology: a Primer on Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology and Cardiac Imaging.

Dilsizian M, Siegel E Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018; 20(12):139.

PMID: 30334108 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-018-1074-8.


Computer-aided detection of brain metastasis on 3D MR imaging: Observer performance study.

Sunwoo L, Kim Y, Choi S, Kim K, Kang J, Kang Y PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0178265.

PMID: 28594923 PMC: 5464563. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178265.