» Articles » PMID: 16172388

Abstract Number and Arithmetic in Preschool Children

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2005 Sep 21
PMID 16172388
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Educated humans use language to express abstract number, applying the same number words to seven apples, whistles, or sins. Is language or education the source of numerical abstraction? Claims to the contrary must present evidence for numerical knowledge that applies to disparate entities, in people who have received no formal mathematics instruction and cannot express such knowledge in words. Here we show that preschool children can compare and add large sets of elements without counting, both within a single visual-spatial modality (arrays of dots) and across two modalities and formats (dot arrays and tone sequences). In two experiments, children viewed animations and either compared one visible array of dots to a second array or added two successive dot arrays and compared the sum to a third array. In further experiments, a dot array was replaced by a sequence of sounds, so that participants had to integrate quantity information presented aurally and visually. Children performed all tasks successfully, without resorting to guessing strategies or responding to continuous variables. Their accuracy varied with the ratio of the two quantities: a signature of large, approximate number representations in adult humans and animals. Addition was as accurate as comparison, even though children showed no relevant knowledge when presented with symbolic versions of the addition tasks. Abstract knowledge of number and addition therefore precedes, and may guide, language-based instruction in mathematics.

Citing Articles

Development of number line estsimation in Chinese preschoolers: a comparison between numerical and non-numerical symbols.

Li M, Yang J, Lei X Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1412151.

PMID: 38974108 PMC: 11224542. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412151.


Human brain representations of internally generated outcomes of approximate calculation revealed by ultra-high-field brain imaging.

Czajko S, Vignaud A, Eger E Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):572.

PMID: 38233387 PMC: 10794709. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44810-5.


Development of precision of non-symbolic arithmetic operations in 4-6-year-old children.

Cheng C, Kibbe M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1286195.

PMID: 38034281 PMC: 10684939. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1286195.


Diverse mathematical knowledge among indigenous Amazonians.

OShaughnessy D, Cordero T, Mollica F, Boni I, Jara-Ettinger J, Gibson E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(35):e2215999120.

PMID: 37603761 PMC: 10469040. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2215999120.


Symbolic and non-symbolic predictors of number line task in Italian kindergarteners.

Meloni C, Delogu F, Fanari R Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1137607.

PMID: 37205065 PMC: 10185831. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1137607.


References
1.
Barth H, La Mont K, Lipton J, Dehaene S, Kanwisher N, Spelke E . Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition. 2005; 98(3):199-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.011. View

2.
McCrink K, Wynn K . Large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-old infants. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(11):776-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00755.x. View

3.
Gallistel , Gelman I . Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(2):59-65. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01424-2. View

4.
Dehaene S . Subtracting pigeons: logarithmic or linear?. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(3):244-6; discussion 247. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00343. View

5.
Griffin S, Case R . Evaluating the breadth and depth of training effects when central conceptual structures are taught. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1996; 61(1-2):83-102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.1996.tb00538.x. View