» Articles » PMID: 16167946

Marriage Still Protects Pregnancy

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2005 Sep 20
PMID 16167946
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the risk factors and outcome of pregnancy outside marriage in the 1990s, in conditions of a high percentage of extramarital pregnancies and high standard maternity care, used by the entire pregnant population.

Design: Hospital-based cohort study.

Setting: A university-teaching hospital in Finland.

Population: The 25,373 singleton pregnancies of known marital and cohabiting status.

Methods: Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to estimate the effect of extramarital childbearing on pregnancy outcome. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to control for confounding maternal risk factors.

Main Outcome Measures: Small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants, preterm birth (less than 37 completed weeks), low birthweight (LBW; under 2500 g).

Results: Of the study population, 67.5% were married and 32.5% were unmarried; 24.2% of all mothers were cohabiting. Unmarried status was strongly associated with social disadvantage and particular risk factors, specifically unemployment, smoking and previous pregnancy terminations, which in turn had an impact on obstetric outcome. There were significantly more SGA infants among unmarried mothers (P < 0.001), with an absolute difference of 45%; more preterm deliveries (P= 0.001), with an absolute difference of 17.5%; and more LBW infants (P < 0.001), with an absolute difference of 26%. The differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes between study groups (i) all unmarried women, (ii) cohabiting women and (iii) single women, remained significant after multivariate analysis at adjusted ORs of 1.11, 1.11 and 1.07 for SGA, 1.17, 1.15 and 1.21 for LBW and 1.15, 1.15 and 1.29 for the preterm births, respectively.

Conclusion: Even in the 1990s when cohabitation was already common, pregnancy outside marriage was associated with an overall 20% increase of adverse outcomes, and free maternity care did not overcome the difference.

Citing Articles

Birth and prenatal care outcomes of Latina mothers in the Trump era: Analysis by nativity and country/region of origin.

Gutierrez C, Dollar N PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0281803.

PMID: 36857329 PMC: 9977052. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281803.


The perinatal epidemiology of child and adolescent marriage in Brazil, 2011-2018.

Urquia M, Batista R, Cardoso V, Grandi C, Fafard St Germain A SSM Popul Health. 2022; 18:101093.

PMID: 35464613 PMC: 9018448. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101093.


The unequal consequences of family structures for infant health.

Song H Soc Sci Res. 2021; 100:102604.

PMID: 34627556 PMC: 9812279. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102604.


Does a Rising Median Income Lift All Birth Weights? County Median Income Changes and Low Birth Weight Rates Among Births to Black and White Mothers.

Curtis D, Fuller-Rowell T, Carlson D, Wen M, Kramer M Milbank Q. 2021; 100(1):38-77.

PMID: 34609027 PMC: 8932634. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12532.


Modification of maternal late pregnancy sleep position: a survey evaluation of a New Zealand public health campaign.

Cronin R, Thompson J, Taylor R, Wilson J, Falloon K, Skelton S BMJ Open. 2021; 11(5):e047681.

PMID: 33980531 PMC: 8118030. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047681.