» Articles » PMID: 16161741

Dental Implant Failure Rates and Associated Risk Factors

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2005 Sep 16
PMID 16161741
Citations 124
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To guide treatment planning by analyzing the rates of dental implant failure to determine associated risk factors.

Materials And Methods: All consecutively treated patients from January 1982 until January 2003 were included in a retrospective cohort study, as defined in the hierarchy of evidence for dental implant literature. Data regarding gender, age, implant location, bone quality, bone volume, and medical history were recorded. Correlations between these data and implant survival were calculated to establish relative risk (RR) ratios.

Results: Increasing age was strongly associated with the risk of implant failure. Compared to patients younger than 40 years, patients in the 60-to-79 age group had a significantly higher risk of implant failure (RR = 2.24; P < .05). Gender, hypertension, coronary artery disease, pulmonary disease, steroid therapy, chemotherapy, and not being on hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal women were not associated with a significant increase in implant failure. Smoking (RR = 1.56), diabetes (RR = 2.75), head and neck radiation (RR = 2.73), and postmenopausal estrogen therapy (RR = 2.55) were correlated with a significantly increased failure rate. Overall, implant failure was 8.16% in the maxilla and 4.93% in the mandible (P < .001).

Discussion: Patients who were over age 60, smoked, had a history of diabetes or head and neck radiation, or were postmenopausal and on hormone replacement therapy experienced significantly increased implant failure compared with healthy patients.

Conclusion: Overall, dental implant failure is low and there are no absolute contraindications to implant placement. Conditions that were found to be correlated with an increased risk of failure should be considered during treatment planning and factored into the informed consent process.

Citing Articles

Do patient and surgical factors predict postoperative discomfort in implant dentistry?.

Arockiam A, Chandrashekaraiah P, Shivananjan R, Benzigar R, Nandhini N Evid Based Dent. 2025; .

PMID: 39934387 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-025-01122-x.


Effect of osteopenia and osteoporosis on failure of first and second dental implants: a retrospective observational study.

Frumkin N, Iden J, Schwartz-Arad D Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):40.

PMID: 39230775 PMC: 11374952. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00556-9.


Is Vitamin D Deficiency a Risk Factor for Osseointegration of Dental Implants - A Prospective Study.

Mohsen K, AbdEl-Raouf M, Makram K, ElKassaby M, Khairy M, Abdelaziz M Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024; 14(1):21-26.

PMID: 39184430 PMC: 11340851. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_165_23.


Nanofeatured surfaces in dental implants: contemporary insights and impending challenges.

Komatsu K, Matsuura T, Cheng J, Kido D, Park W, Ogawa T Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):34.

PMID: 38963524 PMC: 11224214. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00550-1.


Nano-superhydrophilic and bioactive surface in poor bone environment. Part 1: transition from primary to secondary stability. A controlled clinical trial : Bioactive implant surfaces in poor density bone.

Canullo L, Menini M, Pesce P, Iacono R, Sculean A, Fabbro M Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(7):372.

PMID: 38872049 PMC: 11176097. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05747-7.