» Articles » PMID: 16156647

Design of Amphiphilic Protein Maquettes: Enhancing Maquette Functionality Through Binding of Extremely Hydrophobic Cofactors to Lipophilic Domains

Overview
Journal Biochemistry
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2005 Sep 15
PMID 16156647
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We demonstrate coordination of the extremely hydrophobic 13(2)-OH-Ni-bacteriochlorophyll (Ni-BChl) to the lipophilic domain of a novel, designed amphiphilic protein maquette (AP3) dispersed in detergent micelles [Discher et al. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 12329-12343]. Sedimentation velocity and equilibrium experiments and steady-state absorption spectra indicate that Ni-BChl-AP3 is a four-helix bundle containing one Ni-BChl axially ligated by one or two histidines. The nature of the ligation was pursued with ultrafast visible spectroscopy. While it is well established that light excitation of axially ligated mono- and bisimidazole Ni-BChl in solution leads to rapid imidazole dissociation and nanosecond recombination, there is no evidence of axial ligand dissociation in the light-excited Ni-BChl-AP3. This indicates that Ni-BChl is confined within the AP3 protein, ligated to histidines with severely restricted mobility. Dissociation constants show that Ni-BChl binding to AP3 is considerably weaker than the nanomolar range usual for heme and hydrophilic (HP) maquettes; moreover, there is a tendency for the Ni-BChl-AP3 four-helix bundles to dimerize into eight-helix bundles. Nevertheless, the preparation of the Ni-BChl-AP3 four-alpha-helix maquettes, supported by time-resolved spectroscopic analysis of the nature of the ligation, provides a viable new approach to AP maquette designs that address the challenges involved in binding extremely hydrophobic cofactors.

Citing Articles

Computational design of de novo bioenergetic membrane proteins.

Hardy B, Curnow P Biochem Soc Trans. 2024; 52(4):1737-1745.

PMID: 38958574 PMC: 11668274. DOI: 10.1042/BST20231347.


Designing minimalist membrane proteins.

Curnow P Biochem Soc Trans. 2019; 47(5):1233-1245.

PMID: 31671181 PMC: 6824673. DOI: 10.1042/BST20190170.


Designed for life: biocompatible de novo designed proteins and components.

Grayson K, Anderson J J R Soc Interface. 2018; 15(145).

PMID: 30158186 PMC: 6127164. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0472.


First principles design of a core bioenergetic transmembrane electron-transfer protein.

Goparaju G, Fry B, Chobot S, Wiedman G, Moser C, Dutton P Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015; 1857(5):503-512.

PMID: 26672896 PMC: 4846532. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.12.002.


Analytical Ultracentrifugation as a Tool for Studying Protein Interactions.

Schuck P Biophys Rev. 2013; 5(2):159-171.

PMID: 23682298 PMC: 3652485. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-013-0106-2.


References
1.
Dam J, Velikovsky C, Mariuzza R, Urbanke C, Schuck P . Sedimentation velocity analysis of heterogeneous protein-protein interactions: Lamm equation modeling and sedimentation coefficient distributions c(s). Biophys J. 2005; 89(1):619-34. PMC: 1366561. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.059568. View

2.
Dam J, Schuck P . Sedimentation velocity analysis of heterogeneous protein-protein interactions: sedimentation coefficient distributions c(s) and asymptotic boundary profiles from Gilbert-Jenkins theory. Biophys J. 2005; 89(1):651-66. PMC: 1366564. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.059584. View

3.
Cristian L, Nanda V, Lear J, DeGrado W . Synergistic interactions between aqueous and membrane domains of a designed protein determine its fold and stability. J Mol Biol. 2005; 348(5):1225-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.053. View

4.
Chen M, Eggink L, Hoober J, Larkum A . Influence of structure on binding of chlorophylls to peptide ligands. J Am Chem Soc. 2005; 127(7):2052-3. DOI: 10.1021/ja043462b. View

5.
Cochran F, Wu S, Wang W, Nanda V, Saven J, Therien M . Computational de novo design and characterization of a four-helix bundle protein that selectively binds a nonbiological cofactor. J Am Chem Soc. 2005; 127(5):1346-7. DOI: 10.1021/ja044129a. View