» Articles » PMID: 16146546

Tacrolimus As Secondary Intervention Vs. Cyclosporine Continuation in Patients at Risk for Chronic Renal Allograft Failure

Overview
Journal Clin Transplant
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2005 Sep 9
PMID 16146546
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic renal allograft failure (CRAF) is the leading cause of graft loss post-renal transplantation. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as secondary intervention in cyclosporine-treated kidney transplantation patients with impaired allograft function as indicated by elevated serum creatinine (SCr) levels.

Methods: Patients receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression who had an elevated SCr at least 3 months post-renal transplantation were enrolled. Treatment allocation was 2:1 to switch to tacrolimus or continue cyclosporine. This analysis was performed after 2 yr; patients will be followed for an additional 3 yr.

Results: There were 186 enrolled and evaluable patients. On baseline biopsy, 90% of patients had chronic allograft nephropathy. Baseline median SCr was 2.5 mg/dL in both treatment groups. For patients with graft function at month 24, SCr had decreased to 2.3 mg/dL in the tacrolimus-treated patients and increased to 2.6 mg/dL in the cyclosporine-treated patients (p = 0.01). Acute rejection occurred in 4.8% of tacrolimus-treated patients and 5.0% of cyclosporine-treated patients during follow-up. Two-year allograft survival was comparable between groups (tacrolimus 69%, cyclosporine 67%; p = 0.70). Tacrolimus-treated patients had significantly lower cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels and also had fewer new-onset infections. Cardiac conditions developed in significantly fewer tacrolimus-treated patients (5.6%) than cyclosporine-treated patients (24.3%; p = 0.004). Glucose levels and the incidences of new-onset diabetes and new-onset hyperglycemia did not differ between treatment groups.

Conclusions: Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus results in improved renal function and lipid profiles, and significantly fewer cardiovascular events with no differences in the incidence of acute rejection or new-onset hyperglycemia.

Citing Articles

Does diabetes impact therapeutic immunomodulation therapy decisions for kidney transplant recipients? Data from the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplant (FAVORIT) trial.

Weinrauch L, DElia J, Weir M, Bunnapradist S, Finn P, Liu J Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2017; 10:233-242.

PMID: 28860838 PMC: 5571849. DOI: 10.2147/IJNRD.S139901.


A Systematic Literature Review Approach to Estimate the Therapeutic Index of Selected Immunosuppressant Drugs After Renal Transplantation.

Ericson J, Zimmerman K, Gonzalez D, Melloni C, Guptill J, Hill K Ther Drug Monit. 2017; 39(1):13-20.

PMID: 28081041 PMC: 5235278. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000364.


Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study.

Rostaing L, Massari P, Garcia V, Mancilla-Urrea E, Nainan G, Del Carmen Rial M Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 6(2):430-9.

PMID: 21051752 PMC: 3052236. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.05840710.


Cardiovascular outcomes in the outpatient kidney transplant clinic: the Framingham risk score revisited.

Kiberd B, Panek R Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3(3):822-8.

PMID: 18322053 PMC: 2386708. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00030108.