» Articles » PMID: 16140806

Radiographic and Computed Tomography Analysis of Cemented Pegged Polyethylene Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Replacement

Overview
Date 2005 Sep 6
PMID 16140806
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Glenoid loosening continues to be the primary reason for failure of total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, with use of a sensitive and reproducible imaging method, the radiographic and clinical results of total shoulder replacement with a pegged, cemented polyethylene glenoid implant.

Methods: Forty-three patients (forty-seven shoulders) underwent a total shoulder replacement with a cemented polyethylene glenoid component with four threaded pegs. The patients were examined clinically, with fluoroscopically guided radiographs, and with computed tomography at an average of forty months. In addition to conventional scoring of radiographic lucency, an 18-point scoring system was used to quantify cement-peg lucencies in six zones of the back surface of the glenoid component as seen on computed tomography scans.

Results: On the average, the absolute Constant score improved from 39 points preoperatively to 70 points at the time of follow-up (p = 0.0001) and the pain score improved from 5 to 13 points (p = 0.001). The mean active anterior elevation improved by 34 degrees (p = 0.001) and the mean abduction, by 46 degrees (p = 0.006). Two patients had symptomatic glenoid loosening requiring revision. Twenty-one of the forty-seven shoulders had radiographic lucency around the glenoid pegs, and nine had progression of the lucency by at least two grades. Computed tomography detected lucencies, primarily at the bone-cement interface, in thirty-six shoulders. The scores for the lucencies seen on the computed tomography scans were associated with the radiographic lucency scores (p < 0.001), pain scores (p = 0.04), and abduction strength (p = 0.02). Computed tomography was more sensitive than radiography with regard to identifying the number of pegs associated with lucency and the size of the lucencies. The overall reproducibility of the scoring based on the computed tomography was higher than that of the radiographic scoring.

Conclusions: Computed tomography provided a more sensitive and reproducible tool for the assessment of loosening of pegged glenoid components than did fluoroscopically guided conventional radiography. Further improvement in implant design and fixation technique appears to be necessary for long-term success of cemented glenoid components.

Citing Articles

An in vitro study of glenoid implant peripheral peg interface mechanics during eccentric loading and lift-off.

Targosinski J, Kusins J, Athwal G, Nelson A, Ferreira L J Orthop Res. 2024; 43(1):228-237.

PMID: 39319527 PMC: 11615414. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25976.


Bone support correlation of X-Ray and CT for a new PE-glenoid.

Bulhoff M, Sonntag N, Trefzer R, Hirt B, Jager S, Schonhoff M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(9):4499-4504.

PMID: 39313641 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05556-3.


Implant breakage after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of data from worldwide arthroplasty registries and clinical trials.

Liebhauser M, Hohenberger G, Lohberger B, Hauer G, Deluca A, Sadoghi P BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):804.

PMID: 37821859 PMC: 10565962. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06922-9.


Treatment options for complex shoulder osteoarthritis with posterior humeral head subluxation and glenoid bone loss (Walch B): A systematic review.

Scarcella M, Yalcin S, Ginesin E, Patel R, Miniaci A JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 2(3):285-296.

PMID: 37588863 PMC: 10426496. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.04.007.


Serial 3D CT analysis of humeral head alignment in relation to glenoid correction and outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Jacxsens M, Henninger H, Van Tongel A, De Wilde L JSES Int. 2023; 7(3):485-492.

PMID: 37266163 PMC: 10229416. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.007.