» Articles » PMID: 16107527

Neural Representation of Bitter Taste in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2005 Aug 19
PMID 16107527
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Based on the molecular findings that many bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are expressed within the same receptor cells, it has been proposed that bitter taste is encoded by the activation of discrete neural elements. Here we examined how a variety of bitter stimuli are represented by neural activity in central gustatory neurons. Taste responses (spikes/s) evoked by bathing the tongue and palate with intensity-matched concentrations (in M) of 2 sugars (0.32 sucrose and 0.5 D-fructose), ethanol (40%), 4 salts (0.01 NaCl, 0.008 NaNO(3), 0.01 MgCl(2), and 0.05 KCl), 2 acids (0.003 HCl and 0.005 citric acid), and 10 bitter ligands (0.007 quinine-HCl, 0.015 denatonium benzoate, 0.003 l-cysteine, 0.001 nicotine, 0.005 strychnine-HCl, 0.04 tetraethylammonium chloride, 0.03 atropine-SO(4), 0.005 brucine-SO(4), 0.03 papaverine-HCl, and 0.009 sparteine) were recorded from 51 neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract of anesthetized rats. Cluster analysis was used to categorize neurons into types based on responses to sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine-HCl. Three groupings emerged: type S (responded optimally to sweets), type N (sodium-optimal), and type H/Q (responded robustly to bitters, acids, and salts). Multivariate analyses revealed that across-neuron patterns of response among bitter stimuli were strongly correlated. However, neural type H/Q, which was most responsive to bitter tastants, was not differentially sensitive to bitter stimuli and Na(+) salts, which rats perceive as distinct. Thus central neurons most responsive to bitter substances receive significant input from receptors that mediate other tastes, indicating that bitter stimuli are not represented by activity in specifically tuned neurons.

Citing Articles

Neurobiological Mechanisms of Nicotine Reward and Aversion.

Wills L, Ables J, Braunscheidel K, Caligiuri S, Elayouby K, Fillinger C Pharmacol Rev. 2022; 74(1):271-310.

PMID: 35017179 PMC: 11060337. DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.121.000299.


Sensory Effects of Nicotine and Tobacco.

Carstens E, Carstens M Nicotine Tob Res. 2021; 24(3):306-315.

PMID: 33955474 PMC: 8842437. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab086.


Adolescent ethanol exposure and differential rearing environment affect taste reactivity to ethanol in rats.

Wukitsch T, Moser T, Brase E, Kiefer S, Cain M Alcohol. 2020; 89:113-122.

PMID: 32937167 PMC: 7722211. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2020.09.001.


A subset of broadly responsive Type III taste cells contribute to the detection of bitter, sweet and umami stimuli.

Dutta Banik D, Benfey E, Martin L, Kay K, Loney G, Nelson A PLoS Genet. 2020; 16(8):e1008925.

PMID: 32790785 PMC: 7425866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008925.


Differential rearing alters taste reactivity to ethanol, sucrose, and quinine.

Wukitsch T, Brase E, Moser T, Kiefer S, Cain M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019; 237(2):583-597.

PMID: 31832722 PMC: 7747299. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05394-x.