Fast, Visual Specialization for Reading in English Revealed by the Topography of the N170 ERP Response

Overview

Journal Behav Brain Funct

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Social Sciences

Date 2005 Aug 11

PMID 16091138

Citations 89

Authors

Urs Maurer

Daniel Brandeis

Bruce D McCandliss

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: N170 effects associated with visual words may be related to perceptual expertise effects that have been demonstrated for faces and other extensively studied classes of visual stimuli. Although face and other object expertise effects are typically bilateral or right-lateralized, the spatial topography of reading-related N170 effects are often left-lateralized, providing potential insights into the unique aspects of reading-related perceptual expertise.

Methods: Extending previous research in German, we use a high-density channel array to characterize the N170 topography for reading-related perceptual expertise in English, a language with inconsistent spelling-to-sound mapping. N170 effects related to overall reading-related expertise are defined by contrasting responses to visual words versus novel symbol strings. By contrasting each of these conditions to pseudowords, we examined how this reading-related N170 effect generalizes to well-ordered novel letter strings.

Results: A sample-by-sample permutation test computed on word versus symbol ERP topographies revealed differences during two time windows corresponding to the N170 and P300 components. Topographic centroid analysis of the word and symbol N170 demonstrated significant differences in both left-right as well as inferior-superior dimensions. Words elicited larger N170 negativities than symbols at inferior occipito-temporal channels, with the maximal effect over left inferior regions often unsampled in conventional electrode montages. Further contrasts produced inferior-superior topographic effects for the pseudoword-symbol comparison and left-lateralized topographic effects for the word-pseudoword comparison.

Conclusion: Fast specialized perception related to reading experience produces an N170 modulation detectable across different EEG systems and different languages. Characterization of such effects may be improved by sampling with greater spatial frequency recordings that sample inferior regions. Unlike in German, reading-related expertise effects in English produced only partial generalization in N170 responses to novel pseudowords. The topographic inferior-superior N170 differences may reflect general perceptual expertise for orthographic strings, as it was found for words and pseudowords across both languages. The topographic left-right N170 difference between words and pseudowords was only found in English, and may suggest that ambiguity in pronunciating novel pseudowords due to inconsistency in spelling-to-sound mapping influences early stages of letter string processing.

Citing Articles

Neurocognitive dynamics of preparatory and adaptive cognitive control: Insights from mass-univariate and multivariate pattern analysis of EEG data.

Garcia Alanis J, Guth M, Chavanon M, Peper M PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311319.

PMID: 39432477 PMC: 11493265. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311319.

The effect of inter-letter spacing on the N170 during visual word recognition: An event-related potentials experiment.

Civera T, Perea M, Leone-Fernandez B, Vergara-Martinez M Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(6):1096-1108.

PMID: 39313747 PMC: 11525266. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01221-9.

An early effect of the parafoveal preview on post-saccadic processing of English words.

Melcher D, Alaberkyan A, Anastasaki C, Liu X, Deodato M, Marsicano G Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 87(1):94-119.

PMID: 38956003 PMC: 11845564. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02916-4.

Electrophysiological evidence of lexical processing impacted by foreign language reading anxiety.

Li L, Yu Q, Wang Y, Wang Z, Zhou X, Guan Q Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e30061.

PMID: 38720696 PMC: 11076877. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30061.

Electrophysiological signatures of spelling sensitivity development from primary school age to adulthood.

Larionova E, Rebreikina A, Martynova O Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7585.

PMID: 38555413 PMC: 10981698. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58219-z.

References

Paulesu E, McCrory E, Fazio F, Menoncello L, Brunswick N, Cappa S . A cultural effect on brain function. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 3(1):91-6. DOI: 10.1038/71163. View

Bentin S, Mouchetant-Rostaing Y, Giard M, Echallier J, Pernier J . ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999; 11(3):235-60. DOI: 10.1162/089892999563373. View

Dale A, Liu A, Fischl B, Buckner R, Belliveau J, Lewine J . Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron. 2000; 26(1):55-67. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81138-1. View

Holmes A, Blair R, Watson J, Ford I . Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996; 16(1):7-22. DOI: 10.1097/00004647-199601000-00002. View

Lehmann D, Skrandies W . Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man--a review. Prog Neurobiol. 1984; 23(3):227-50. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0082(84)90003-0. View

Tanaka J, Curran T . A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(1):43-7. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00308. View

Brem S, Lang-Dullenkopf A, Maurer U, Halder P, Bucher K, Brandeis D . Neurophysiological signs of rapidly emerging visual expertise for symbol strings. Neuroreport. 2004; 16(1):45-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200501190-00011. View

Lehmann D, Skrandies W . Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980; 48(6):609-21. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90419-8. View

Cohen L, Dehaene S, Naccache L, Lehericy S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Henaff M . The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain. 2000; 123 ( Pt 2):291-307. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.2.291. View

10.

Maurer U, Bucher K, Brem S, Brandeis D . Altered responses to tone and phoneme mismatch in kindergartners at familial dyslexia risk. Neuroreport. 2003; 14(17):2245-50. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200312020-00022. View

11.

Proverbio A, Vecchi L, Zani A . From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004; 16(2):301-17. DOI: 10.1162/089892904322984580. View

12.

Zhang X, Begleiter H, Porjesz B, Litke A . Visual object priming differs from visual word priming: an ERP study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997; 102(3):200-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(96)95172-3. View

13.

Skrandies W . Evoked potential correlates of semantic meaning--A brain mapping study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1998; 6(3):173-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(97)00033-5. View

14.

Tarkiainen A, Helenius P, Hansen P, Cornelissen P, Salmelin R . Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Brain. 1999; 122 ( Pt 11):2119-32. DOI: 10.1093/brain/122.11.2119. View

15.

Maurer U, Bucher K, Brem S, Brandeis D . Development of the automatic mismatch response: from frontal positivity in kindergarten children to the mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 114(5):808-17. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00032-4. View

16.

Compton P, Grossenbacher P, Posner M, Tucker D . A cognitive-anatomical approach to attention in lexical access. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 3(4):304-12. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.304. View

17.

Ferree T, Luu P, Russell G, Tucker D . Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(3):536-44. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00533-2. View

18.

Neville H, Mills D, Lawson D . Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cereb Cortex. 1992; 2(3):244-58. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/2.3.244. View

19.

Oostenveld R, Praamstra P . The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(4):713-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00527-7. View

20.

Tucker D . Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993; 87(3):154-63. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90121-b. View