» Articles » PMID: 16087941

Combined Chemoradiotherapy Regimens of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Locally Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: a Randomized Phase II Locally Advanced Multi-modality Protocol

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2005 Aug 10
PMID 16087941
Citations 110
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This phase II noncomparative randomized trial was conducted to determine the optimal sequencing and integration of paclitaxel/carboplatin with standard daily thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), in patients with locally advanced unresected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Survival data were compared with historical standard sequential chemoradiotherapy data from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Patients And Methods: Patients with unresected stages IIIA and IIIB NSCLC, with Karnofsky performance status > or = 70% and weight loss < or = 10%, received two cycles of induction paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration time curve [AUC] = 6) followed by TRT 63.0 Gy (arm 1, sequential) or two cycles of induction paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 6) followed by weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 2) with concurrent TRT 63.0 Gy (arm 2, induction/concurrent), or weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 2)/TRT (63.0 Gy) followed by two cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 6; arm 3, concurrent/consolidation).

Results: With a median follow-up time of 39.6 months, median overall survival was 13.0, 12.7, and 16.3 months for arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. During induction chemotherapy, grade 3/4 granulocytopenia occurred in 32% and 38% of patients on study arms 1 and 2, respectively. The most common locoregional grade 3/4 toxicity during and after TRT was esophagitis, which was more pronounced with the administration of concurrent chemoradiotherapy on study arms 2 and 3 (19% and 28%, respectively).

Conclusion: Concurrent weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and TRT followed by consolidation seems to be associated with the best outcome, although this schedule was associated with greater toxicity.

Citing Articles

A Review of the Current Approach and Treatment Landscape for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Sridhar A, Khan H, Yohannan B, Chan K, Kataria N, Jafri S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731161 PMC: 11084624. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092633.


Management of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: rays of hope.

Kim F, Borgeaud M, Addeo A, Friedlaender A Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024; 5(1):85-95.

PMID: 38464384 PMC: 10924713. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00206.


The Best Supportive Care in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

de Oliveira T, Fontes D, Montella T, Lewgoy J, Dutra C, Miola T Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(1):183-202.

PMID: 38248097 PMC: 10814676. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010012.


Update on the Management of Stage III NSCLC: Navigating a Complex and Heterogeneous Stage of Disease.

Sathiyapalan A, Baloush Z, Ellis P Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(11):9514-9529.

PMID: 37999109 PMC: 10670056. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110689.


Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival in patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang L, Chen W, Xu X, Chen W, Bao D, Zhang Y Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023; 14:20406223231195622.

PMID: 37720592 PMC: 10501070. DOI: 10.1177/20406223231195622.