Psychiatric Disease in the Genomic Era: Rational Approach
Overview
Psychiatry
Authors
Affiliations
Although the introduction of explicit diagnostic criteria and rule-based classifications, such as Research Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Ed 3 and Ed 4, has dramatically influenced teaching and research psychiatric practice, it has significant limitations. As new knowledge is developed with genetic, imaging and metabolomic technologies, a method to incorporate this research in a systematic manner with current classification systems is needed. The current approach, which is essentially nominalist in character, has to be developed where new data and new concepts of disease can be integrated and tested. Examples of how this could happen is shown in the context of Alzheimer's disease and subcortical ischemic disease. It is likely that a standardized approach that can develop and modify classification systems in a timely manner, based on science and free of societal and political influence, can enhance research, teaching and clinical practice.
Brown A, Altman D, Baranowski T, Bland J, Dawson J, Dhurandhar N Obes Rev. 2019; 20(11):1523-1541.
PMID: 31426126 PMC: 7436851. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12923.
A knowledge network for a dynamic taxonomy of psychiatric disease.
Krishnan R Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015; 17(1):79-87.
PMID: 25987866 PMC: 4421904.
A functional alternative splicing mutation in human tryptophan hydroxylase-2.
Zhang X, Nicholls P, Laje G, Sotnikova T, Gainetdinov R, Albert P Mol Psychiatry. 2010; 16(12):1169-76.
PMID: 20856248 PMC: 3021090. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2010.99.
Towards a scientific taxonomy of depression.
Krishnan K Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008; 10(3):301-8.
PMID: 18979943 PMC: 3181886.
Bjerkeset O, Nordahl H, Larsson S, Dahl A, Linaker O Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007; 43(3):192-9.
PMID: 18064394 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-007-0289-6.