» Articles » PMID: 16061095

Dissociated Optic Nerve Fiber Layer Appearance After Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Idiopathic Macular Holes

Overview
Journal Ophthalmology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2005 Aug 3
PMID 16061095
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the characteristics and incidence of a dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) appearance in eyes after idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Design: Retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative interventional case series.

Participants: Ninety-one eyes with idiopathic macular holes that were closed after 1 pars plana vitrectomy were studied. Among these, 67 eyes had the internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeled (ILM-peeled), and 24 did not have the ILM peeled (ILM-unpeeled).

Methods: All patients received a complete ophthalmologic examination and color fundus photography preoperatively and postoperatively. Twenty ILM-peeled eyes and 9 ILM-unpeeled eyes were also examined by optical coherence tomography (OCT3), microperimetry by scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO), and macular sensitivity measurements by Humphrey visual field testing more than 4 months after the vitrectomy.

Main Outcome Measures: Development of a DONFL on fundus photographs and OCT3, and the functional evaluation of a DONFL by best-corrected visual acuity, SLO-microperimetry, and Humphrey visual field testing.

Results: In 67 ILM-peeled eyes, a DONFL appearance was found in 36 eyes (54%) in color fundus photographs. A DONFL appearance was not detected in any of the 24 ILM-unpeeled eyes. Focal dehiscence of the optic nerve fiber layer was found in all 20 examined eyes by OCT3. No scotoma was found corresponding to the DONFL by SLO microperimetry. The best-corrected visual acuity and macular sensitivity were not significantly different in eyes with and without a DONFL appearance (P>0.05). A DONFL appearance was not detected in all 20 eyes examined within 1 month after surgery, was detected in all 16 eyes examined between 1 and 3 months, and no new cases were detected after 3 months. The DONFL appearance became more distinct until about 6 months after first detection and seemed not to change subsequently.

Conclusions: The DONFL appearance in about half of the eyes with ILM peeling and none in eyes without ILM peeling strongly suggest that the DONFL appearance is related to ILM peeling. The OCT findings in eyes with no functional abnormality by SLO microperimetry suggested that the DONFL is due to a dehiscence of the optic nerve fiber layer and not a true nerve fiber layer defect.

Citing Articles

The effect of inner limiting membrane peeling on visual fields: Unravelling a source of bias in glaucoma management.

Nurkan M, Eijgen J, De Clerck I, Stalmans I, Barbosa-Breda J Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2025; 38(4):332-342.

PMID: 39943945 PMC: 11811406. DOI: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_156_24.


Internal limiting membrane peel size and macular hole surgery outcome: a systematic review and individual participant data study of randomized controlled trials.

Teh B, Li Y, Nanji K, Phillips M, Chaudhary V, Steel D Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39922971 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03666-9.


Comparison of conventional internal limiting membrane versus pars plana vitrectomy without peeling for small idiopathic macular hole.

Ruggeri M, Quarta A, Marolo P, Zeppa L, Motta L, Gironi M Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024; 10(1):81.

PMID: 39449027 PMC: 11515618. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-024-00599-5.


The Flip and Fix internal limiting flap technique versus the classic temporal flap for macular hole repair.

Shousha M, Lolah M, Ahmed I Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(Suppl 5):S852-S857.

PMID: 39287998 PMC: 11670840. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1155_24.


Internal limiting membrane peeling in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis.

Chen G, Tzekov R, Fang Y, Tong Y, Li W PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0297230.

PMID: 38489304 PMC: 10942048. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297230.