» Articles » PMID: 16054147

Role of Long Stem Revision Knee Prosthesis in Periprosthetic and Complex Distal Femoral Fractures: a Review of Eight Patients

Overview
Journal Injury
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2005 Aug 2
PMID 16054147
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eight patients, six with periprosthetic and two with complex distal femoral fractures (one pathological, and one with failed internal fixation) were treated with a cemented long stem revision arthroplasty prosthesis to address the issues of articular comminution, stability, alignment and early mobilisation. The average age of the patients was 78 years (range 39-81). There were no intra-operative complications. The mean hospital stay was 12 days (range 8-21). Post-operative complications included one case of posterior dislocation and one superficial infection. All patients had remarkable symptomatic relief at 3 months as indicated by the visual analogue scores. All periprosthetic fractures achieved bony union at a mean time of 3.8 months. The mean follow up was 24 months (range 14-42). The American Knee Society score revealed one 'excellent', five 'good', one 'satisfactory' and one 'poor' result. The mean loss of extension was 7.7 degrees (range 5 degrees -15 degrees ) and the mean flexion achieved was 66 degrees (range: 15 degrees to 85 degrees ). The mean alignment was 6 degrees (range 0 degrees -10 degrees ) valgus. This study highlights the role of long stem prosthesis in periprosthetic and some complex distal femoral fractures in offering stability and early mobilisation.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of fixation versus arthroplasty for geriatric distal femur fractures.

Brodke D, Devana S, Upfill-Brown A, Lee C Injury. 2021; 53(2):661-668.

PMID: 34887075 PMC: 10400013. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.054.


Management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures using distal femoral arthroplasty and fixation - Comparative study of outcomes and costs.

Tandon T, Tadros B, Avasthi A, Hill R, Rao M J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020; 11(1):160-164.

PMID: 32002006 PMC: 6985021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.05.015.


Periprosthetic knee fractures. A review of epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and outcome.

Canton G, Ratti C, Fattori R, Hoxhaj B, Murena L Acta Biomed. 2017; 88(2S):118-128.

PMID: 28657573 PMC: 6179004. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v88i2 -S.6522.


Distal femoral replacement for selective periprosthetic fractures above a total knee arthroplasty.

Rao B, Kamal T, Vafe J, Moss M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 40(2):191-9.

PMID: 26815900 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-013-0347-6.


Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Ebraheim N, Kelley L, Liu X, Thomas I, Steiner R, Liu J Orthop Surg. 2016; 7(4):297-305.

PMID: 26790831 PMC: 6583744. DOI: 10.1111/os.12199.