» Articles » PMID: 16047516

Development and Validation of the Interview Version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2005 Jul 29
PMID 16047516
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The Hong Kong Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF was designed as a self-administered questionnaire and has limitations in clinical application on subjects who have limitations in reading or writing. An interview version is therefore needed to avoid sampling biases in clinical studies. Since there are significant differences in the written Chinese and spoken Cantonese, which is a dialect commonly spoken among people in Hong Kong, and adaptation process for converting the written Chinese into spoken Cantonese was necessary. The interview version was designed to allow administration in both face-to-face interview and telephone interview mode.

Methods: Three members of the research team translated the formal written Chinese in the self-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF(HK) into colloquial Cantonese separately. Brief notes extracted from the facet definitions of the WHOQOL-100 were added in brackets after some questions to further explain the intention of the questions. Two series of focus groups were conducted and subsequently the field test version was produced. 329 subjects were recruited by convenient sampling method for the field test.

Results: The interview version and the self-administered version was found equivalent. The ICC values of the domain scores ranged from 0.73 in the environment domain to 0.83 in the psychological domain. The face-to-face interview and telephone interview mode of administration were also found equivalent. The ICC for the domain scores ranged from 0.76 in the social interaction domain to 0.84 in the psychological domain. The other psychometric properties of the interview version were found comparable to the self-administered version.

Conclusion: The self-administered and the interview version of the WHOQOL-BREF are regarded as identical in group comparison. The authors advise that it is acceptable to use different versions on different subjects in the same study, provided that the same version is applied on the same subject throughout the study.

Citing Articles

A cross-sectional survey on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological well-being and quality of life in people with spinal cord injury.

Altahla R, Alshorman J, Ali I, Tao X J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):564.

PMID: 39272212 PMC: 11401369. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04955-x.


Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Survivors: Mapping the Key Indicators by Expert Consensus and Measures for Their Assessment.

Smrke U, Abalde-Cela S, Loly C, Calbimonte J, Pires L, Lin S Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 38921349 PMC: 11203183. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12121235.


Access to civil justice as a social determinant of health: a legal epidemiological cross-sectional study.

Fung E, Dong D Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):123.

PMID: 38877451 PMC: 11179223. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02205-4.


Exploring potential EQ-5D bolt-on dimensions with a qualitative approach: an interview study in Hong Kong SAR, China.

Cheuk Wai Ng C, Wai Ling Cheung A, Wong E Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024; 22(1):42.

PMID: 38816769 PMC: 11141055. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02259-6.


Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with β-Thalassemia that Underwent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Mulas O, Pili I, Sanna M, La Nasa G Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2024; 19(Suppl-1):e174501792301031.

PMID: 38659631 PMC: 11037551. DOI: 10.2174/17450179-v17-e211208-2021-HT2-1910-4.


References
1.
Brazier J, Harper R, Jones N, OCathain A, Thomas K, Usherwood T . Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992; 305(6846):160-4. PMC: 1883187. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. View

2.
Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, Morgan M . The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults?. Age Ageing. 1995; 24(2):120-5. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/24.2.120. View

3.
. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41(10):1403-9. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k. View