» Articles » PMID: 16045257

The Role of Prediction in Construction-learning

Overview
Journal J Child Lang
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2005 Jul 28
PMID 16045257
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is well-established that (non-linguistic) categorization is driven by a functional demand of prediction. We suggest that prediction likewise may well play a role in motivating the learning of semantic generalizations about argument structure constructions. We report corpora statistics that indicate that the argument frame or construction has roughly equivalent cue validity as a predictor of overall sentence meaning as the morphological form of the verb, and has greater category validity. That is, the construction is at least as reliable and more available than the verb. Moreover, given the fact that many verbs have quite low cue validity in isolation, attention to the contribution of the construction is essential.

Citing Articles

Rational and Flexible Adaptation of Sentence Production to Ongoing Language Experience.

Thothathiri M Front Psychol. 2021; 12:647076.

PMID: 33841283 PMC: 8027072. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647076.


Neural systems involved in processing novel linguistic constructions and their visual referents.

Johnson M, Turk-Browne N, Goldberg A Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016; 31(1):129-144.

PMID: 27453896 PMC: 4955660. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1055280.


Acquiring and Producing Sentences: Whether Learners Use Verb-Specific or Verb-General Information Depends on Cue Validity.

Thothathiri M, Rattinger M Front Psychol. 2016; 7:404.

PMID: 27047428 PMC: 4803733. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00404.


Verbs and attention to relational roles in English and Tamil.

Sethuraman N, Smith L J Child Lang. 2012; 40(2):358-90.

PMID: 22289295 PMC: 3753199. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000911000523.


Cross-linguistic Differences in Talking About Scenes.

Sethuraman N, Smith L J Pragmat. 2010; 42(11):2978-2991.

PMID: 20802845 PMC: 2928482. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.021.