» Articles » PMID: 1602272

Mechanics of the Animate

Overview
Date 1992 May 1
PMID 1602272
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Behavior is treated as basic physics. Dimensions are identified and their transformations from physical specification to axes in behavioral space are suggested. Responses are treated as action patterns arrayed along a continuum of activation energy. Behavior is seen as movement along a trajectory through this behavior space. Incentives or reinforcers are attractors in behavior space, at the centers of basins of lowered potential. Trajectories impinging on such basins may be captured; repeated capture will warp the trajectory toward a geodesic, a process called conditioning. Conditioning is enhanced by contiguity, the proximity between the measured behavior and the incentive at the end of the trajectory, and by contingency, the depth of the trajectory below the average level of the potential energy landscape. Motivation is seen as the potential of an organism for motion under the forces impinging on it. Degree of motivation is characterized by the depth of the potential field, with low motivation corresponding to a flat field and a flat gradient of activation energy. Drives are the forces of incentives propagated through behavior space. Different laws for the attenuation of drive with behavioral distance are discussed, as is the dynamics of action. The basic postulate of behavior mechanics is incentive-tracking in behavior space, the energy for which is provided by decreases in potential. The relation of temporal gradients to response differentiation and temporal discrimination is analyzed. Various two-body problems are sketched to illustrate the application of these ideas to association, choice, scalar timing, self-control, and freedom.

Citing Articles

The action dynamics of approach-avoidance conflict during decision-making.

Garcia-Guerrero S, OHora D, Zgonnikov A, Scherbaum S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022; 76(1):160-179.

PMID: 35236183 PMC: 9773158. DOI: 10.1177/17470218221087625.


Coal Is Not Black, Snow Is Not White, Food Is Not a Reinforcer: The Roles of Affordances and Dispositions in the Analysis of Behavior.

Killeen P, Jacobs K Behav Anal. 2020; 40(1):17-38.

PMID: 31976967 PMC: 6701234. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-016-0080-7.


Local dynamics in decision making: The evolution of preference within and across decisions.

OHora D, Dale R, Piiroinen P, Connolly F Sci Rep. 2013; 3:2210.

PMID: 23860466 PMC: 3713532. DOI: 10.1038/srep02210.


Using action dynamics to assess competing stimulus control during stimulus equivalence testing.

OHora D, Tyndall I, McMorrow M, Dale R Learn Behav. 2013; 41(3):256-70.

PMID: 23378287 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0102-1.


The effects of a local negative feedback function between choice and relative reinforcer rate.

Davison M, Elliffe D, Marr M J Exp Anal Behav. 2011; 94(2):197-207.

PMID: 21451748 PMC: 2929085. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-197.


References
1.
Killeen P, Fantino E . Unification of models for choice between delayed reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990; 53(1):189-200. PMC: 1323034. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-189. View

2.
Williams D, Butler M, Overmier J . Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990; 16(1):3-13. View

3.
Reed P, Reilly S . Context extinction following conditioning with delayed reward enhances subsequent instrumental responding. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990; 16(1):48-55. View

4.
BAILEY J, Mazur J . Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990; 53(3):409-22. PMC: 1322966. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-409. View

5.
Ganesan R, Pearce J . Interactions between conditioned stimuli for food and water in the rat. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1988; 40(3):229-41. View